TL;DR: The most likely explanations for the lack of efficacy of CAP are poor compliance to the protocol and relative inactivity of the regimen, compared with the activity of drug combinations used in more recent studies.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Most studies of adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with complete surgical resection of disease have shown negative results. However, two studies of stage II and III disease by our Lung Cancer Study Group suggested an advantage to adjuvant therapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (CAP). PURPOSE Since neither of those studies had an untreated control, the Lung Cancer Study Group undertook a trial that included a control group and also offered the potential benefit of adjuvant therapy with CAP to patients with T1, N1 or T2, N0 (stage I) non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS After complete resection, eligible patients with stage I disease were classified by known prognostic factors and randomly assigned to receive or not to receive four courses of CAP at 3-week intervals beginning on day 30 after surgery. The CAP regimen consisted of 400 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, 40 mg/m2 doxorubicin, and 60 mg/m2 cisplatin. Stratification by prognostic factors was as follows: histology (squamous versus nonsquamous), white blood cell count before surgery (> or = 9100/mm3 versus < 9100/mm3), and Karnofsky performance status before surgery (< or = 90% versus 100%). RESULTS Of the 269 patients entered in the study, 101 had recurrence and 127 have died. Mean time since randomization is 6.4 years; mean follow-up is 3.8 years. There were no differences in time to recurrence or overall survival (not stratified by histology) between the two groups, even when analyses were adjusted for prognostic variables. There was one treatment-related death on the CAP arm due to infection during neutropenia. Only 53% of the eligible patients received all four courses of CAP, and only 57% of such patients received all four cycles on time. In 74% of the patients, the site of initial recurrence was distant. CONCLUSIONS The most likely explanations for the lack of efficacy of CAP are poor compliance to the protocol and relative inactivity of the regimen, compared with the activity of drug combinations used in more recent studies. On the basis of this trial, adjuvant therapy with CAP should not be recommended for patients with resected stage I lung cancer. IMPLICATIONS Further trials to test adjuvant therapy are indicated, but investigators should use better antiemetics to improve patient compliance as well as more active chemotherapy regimens.
TL;DR: No survival benefit for CAP vs no-treatment control was found in this study, and adjuvant therapy with CAP should not be recommended for patients with resected early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.
TL;DR: Eight patients with malignant thymoma or thymic carcinoma took part in a multimodality treatment program including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and postoperative radiotherapy in the authors' center between December 1995 and June 2001, and 4 patients achieved the planned radiotherapy.
Abstract: Little is known regarding malignant thymoma and thymic carcinoma optimal therapy, and a multimodality approach could therefore be proposed in an attempt to improve the survival of patients. We report our experience with 8 cases of malignant thymoma or thymic carcinoma. These patients took part in a multimodality treatment program including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and postoperative radiotherapy in our center between December 1995 and June 2001. The induction chemotherapy consisted of 4 courses of the CAP regimen (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 day 1, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 day 1, and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 day 2), every 3 weeks. Patients underwent surgical resection after complete hematological recovery pending sufficient tumor response with a postchemotherapy resectable status. Adjuvant radiotherapy up to 60 Gy in 30 fractions was attempted postsurgically or after best chemotherapeutic response in nonsurgical patients. Among the 8 patients, 3 had a thymic carcinoma and 5 a malignant thymoma; 5 had a stage IV and 3 a stage III disease (Masaoka). Six patients partially responded to the chemotherapy regimen. Three patients were operated upon, and complete resection was performed in 2 cases. Finally, 4 patients achieved the planned radiotherapy. Four patients are still alive without evidence of tumor activity (23-77 months from the diagnosis) and 1 patient is alive with relapse at 56 months. The low compliance with the program led us to an early discontinuation. The high proportion of thymic carcinoma and advanced disease in our limited series might be an explanation for this unsatisfactory result. Optimal multimodality treatment of epithelial thymic tumor remains to be defined in multicenter trials.
TL;DR: The results of this study were considered as promising; a definitive assessment of the CAP regimen is expected to come from a randomized study which started in the CMEA countries in 1983.
Abstract: Fourteen patients with advanced carcinoma of the breast were treated with CAP combination therapy. An objective therapeutic response (partial remissions with a mean duration of 6.3 months) was achieved in 6 of 13 evaluated patients. This response was observed in soft tissue metastases. Nausea and vomiting were found to be the most frequent undesirable side effects in all patients and could not be avoided by administration of antiemetics. In 2 patients mild nephrotoxicity was found without any effects on further therapy. The results of this study were considered as promising; a definitive assessment of the CAP regimen is expected to come from a randomized study which started in the CMEA countries in 1983.