TL;DR: The aim of this article was to provide guidelines for the routine clinical use of some of these markers, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), for colorectal cancer detection and monitoring purposes.
TL;DR: An algorithm based on the combination of CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 improved the diagnostic accuracy in gastrointestinal tract malignancies compared with these markers alone.
Abstract: Background CEA, CA 19-9, CA 242 and CA 72-4 are commonly used tumour markers for gastrointestinal malignancies. The advantage of the concomitant use of these markers is under debate. Materials and methods Serum concentrations of the markers were measured at the time of diagnosis in 161 patients with benign and 125 with malignant gastrointestinal diseases. Concomitant use of the markers was evaluated in a logistic regression model. Results CA 19-9, CA 242 or CA 72-4 showed similar sensitivity of 44% for gastric cancer, whereas CEA was elevated in 25% of the cases. In patients with colorectal cancer, CEA was most frequently elevated (54%), followed by CA 242 (46%), CA 19-9 (36%) and CA 72-4 (25%). High CA 19-9 and CA 242 serum levels were frequent in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (86% and 68%, respectively) and pancreatic cancer (80% and 63%, respectively). In the benign disease group, serum CA 19-9 was most frequently elevated, i.e. in 24%, 25% and 38% of patients with pancreatic, biliary and liver disorders, respectively. The overall accuracy of CEA, CA 19-9, CA 242 and CA 72-4 was 66%, 71%, 71% and 66%, respectively (p > 0.18). When combined in a logistic regression model, CA 72-4, CA 19-9 and CEA provided independent diagnostic information, whereas CA 242 contributed with independent diagnostic information only on excluding CA 19-9. The probability of cancer for each patient, calculated with the model, was applied as a diagnostic test and was compared with the single markers by ROC-curve analysis. The AUC value of the probability index was significantly higher than the values of the different tumour markers. Conclusion An algorithm based on the combination of CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 improved the diagnostic accuracy in gastrointestinal tract malignancies compared with these markers alone.
TL;DR: Elevated CEA, CA 19‐9, CA 242, CA 72‐4 and hCGβ relate to poor outcome in colorectal cancer.
Abstract: In colorectal cancer, stage is considered to be the strongest prognostic factor, but also serum tumour markers have been reported to be of prognostic value. The aim of our study was to investigate the prognostic value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA 19-9, CA 242, CA 72-4 and free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG beta) in colorectal cancer. Preoperative serum samples were obtained from 204 colorectal cancer patients, including 31 patients with Dukes' A, 70 with Dukes' B, 49 with Dukes' C and 54 with Dukes' D cancer. The serum levels of CEA, CA 19-9, CA 242 and CA 72-4 were measured with commercial kits with cut-off values of 5 microg/L for CEA, 37 kU/L for CA 19-9, 20 kU/L for CA 242 and 6 kU/L for CA 72-4. The serum hCG beta was quantitated by an immunofluorometric assay (IFMA) with 2 pmol/L as a cut-off value. Survival analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier life tables, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. The sensitivity was 44% for CEA, 26% for CA 19-9, 36% for CA 242, 27% for CA 72-4 and 16% for hCG beta. The overall 5-year survival was 55%, and in Dukes' A, B, C and D cancers the survival was 89%, 77%, 52% and 3%, respectively. Elevated serum values of all markers correlated with worse survival (p < 0.001). In Cox multivariate analysis, the strongest prognostic factor was Dukes' stage (p < 0.001), followed by tumour location (p = 0.002) and preoperative serum markers hCG beta (p = 0.002), CA 72-4 (p = 0.003) and CEA (p = 0.005). In conclusion, elevated CEA, CA 19-9, CA 242, CA 72-4 and hCG beta relate to poor outcome in colorectal cancer. In multivariate analysis, independent prognostic significance was observed with hCG beta, CA 72-4 and CEA.
TL;DR: Tumor-Marker Detection by Isotachophoresis in Porous Membranes: Bence-Jones Protein in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.
Abstract: Cancer Markers of the 1990s: An Introduction. Clinical Cancer Markers: Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Monitoring. Alpha-Fetoprotein in the 1990s. Carcinoembryonic Antigen. Prostate-Specific Antigen. Enzyme Markers. Alkaline Phosphatases as Tumor Markers. Sex-Associated Hormones. Tissue Polypeptide Antigen and Specific TPA. Tumor-Associated Carbohydrate Markers: Chemical and Physical Basis and Cell Biological Implications. Glycoamines: Structural-Functional Characterization of a New Class of Human Tumor Markers. CA 15-3 Assay for the Detection of Episialin: A Serum Marker for Breast Cancer. Clinical Applications of CA 15-3. CA 19-9, GICA (Gastrointestinal Cancer Antigen). Mucin-Like Cancer-Associated Antigen (MCA) as Available Circulating Tumor Marker for Breast Cancer. DU-PAN-2: A Clinically Useful Mucin Marker of Differentiation of Pancreatic and Other Ductal Cells and Their Tumors. CA 50. TAG-72 as a Tumor Marker. CA 125. CA 242. Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen. Tumor-Marker Detection by Isotachophoresis in Porous Membranes: Bence-Jones Protein in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Multiple Testing with Cancer Markers. New Cancer Products: Predicting Market Success. Comments. Index.
TL;DR: A serological assay for the quantitative determination of the novel tumour-associated epitope CA242 was developed and used for determination of sensitivity and specificity of CA242 in gastrointestinal cancer, and showed a better tumour specificity than CA50.
Abstract: A serological assay for the quantitative determination of the novel tumour-associated epitope CA242 was developed and used for determination of sensitivity and specificity of CA242 in gastrointestinal cancer. The CA242 assay showed a better tumour specificity than CA50 (and CA 19-9). This was most noticeable in benign hepatobiliary disease. The sensitivity at 90% specificity cut-off level was approximately three times higher for CA242 compared to CA50 in colo-rectal cancer Dukes A, B and C, while in pancreatic cancer the sensitivity of CA242 and CA50 was similar. CA242 was expressed independently of CEA, and the combination of CEA and CA242 gave in colo-rectal cancer considerably higher sensitivity than the use of only one of the markers. This was most pronounced in Dukes A and Dukes B patients. CA242 is a novel tumour marker of potential clinical use, particularly in colo-rectal cancer.