TL;DR: A new approach to the theory of cyclic and constacyclic codes is presented and generalize the theory to cover the family of additive (not necessarily linear) cyclic codes.
Abstract: We present a new approach to the theory of cyclic and constacyclic codes and generalize the theory to cover the family of additive (not necessarily linear) cyclic codes. The approach is based on the action of the Galois group (cyclotomic cosets). The conventional representation of cyclic codes as ideals in a factor ring of the polynomial ring is not needed.
TL;DR: In this paper, a burst error in the received information can be detected and corrected using a parity check matrix for correcting burst errors up to b bits, where the burst error is included entirely in any one of the sets of burst error pattern generation circuits.
Abstract: A syndrome S is found from a received information D and a parity check matrix for correcting burst errors up to b bits. The syndrome S is inputted to p sets of burst error pattern generation circuits that correspond to information frames overlapping each other by (b - 1) bits and each having a length of 2b bits. If a burst error is included entirely in any one of the p sets of burst error pattern generation circuits, then the burst error pattern is outputted. An error pattern calculation circuit executes OR respectively on overlapping bits output from the error pattern generation circuits. By executing exclusive OR on an output of the error pattern calculation circuit and received information D, corrected information Ds is obtained. As a result, a burst error in the received information can be detected and corrected.
TL;DR: Binary two-dimensional arrays where the patches of errors contain more than one symbol from the same codeword, i.e. arrays with repetitions are considered, and burst error-correcting codes are used instead of random error- correcting codes.
Abstract: Binary two-dimensional arrays are considered, where the patches of errors contain more than one symbol from the same codeword, i.e. arrays with repetitions. The relative digit positions in each codeword are taken into account when performing interleaving, and burst error-correcting codes are used instead of random error-correcting codes.
TL;DR: In this paper, a parallel decoding method for burst error control codes is presented and the decoding circuit implemented by combinational circuits, not by LFSRs, in order to improve burst error correction and detection.
Abstract: In some applications, such as in holographic memories, high-speed parallel decoding is strongly required for burst error correction and detection. From this viewpoint, this paper demonstrates a parallel decoding method for burst error control codes and presents the decoding circuit implemented by combinational circuits, not by LFSRs.
TL;DR: It is shown that, for (n, k) RS codes, this algorithm can correct continuous burst errors with length that approaches to n-k symbols with fairly low miscorrection probability, achieving a good performance over long-burst channels.
Abstract: Various communication and storage systems are likely corrupted by bursts of noise These bursts may be long in duration, resulting in a significant degradation for the system performance Reed-Solomon (RS) codes are proven to be very effective in correcting burst errors According to the Singleton bound, the maximum length of burst errors that can be corrected by an (n, k) RS code is (n-k)/2 symbols However, it turns out that, if correlation between erroneous symbols within bursts is considered and well used, the variables for burst locations will be decreased and, accordingly, decoding capability may be enhanced with increased length of correctable bursts As such, we propose a new burst-error-correcting algorithm It is shown that, for (n, k) RS codes, this algorithm can correct continuous burst errors with length that approaches to n-k symbols with fairly low miscorrection probability, achieving a good performance over long-burst channels
TL;DR: This paper demonstrates a parallel decoding method for burst error control codes and presents the decoding circuit implemented by combinational circuits, not by LFSRs.
TL;DR: A new code design method of the SEC-B/sub l/EL codes having less check-bits than the burst error correcting fire codes for longer information-bit length is proposed.
Abstract: The error location function of codes was first proposed by Wolf and Elspas in 1963 lying midway between error correction and error detection. In 1982, Dass proposed burst error locating codes. These codes, however, have a problem that they cannot locate burst errors which occur at the boundary of the two adjacent subblocks. From this point, the authors proposed a new class of burst error locating codes indicating an erroneous frame, called single bit error correcting and l-bit burst error locating codes, or SEC-B/sub l/EL codes. Here, the frame is a set of continuous symbols in a codeword and adjacent frames are partially overlapped in order to make any burst errors not exceeding the maximum size of the frame be included in at least one frame. The proposed codes, however, have more check-bits than burst error correcting fire codes for longer information-bit length. This paper proposes a new code design method of the SEC-B/sub l/EL codes having less check-bits than the burst error correcting fire codes.
TL;DR: By using the quantum interleaver, any quantum burst-errors that have occurred are spread over the interleaved code word, so that good quantum Burst Error correcting codes can be constructed without increasing the redundancy of the code.
Abstract: We propose a quantum error correcting code for burst error.% By using the quantum interleaver, any quantum burst-errors that have occurred are spread over the interleaved code word, so that we can construct good quantum burst-error correcting codes without increasing the redundancy of the code.