TL;DR: In this article, the authors provided a partial theory of the indicator bubble commonly used to measure liquid flowrates in capillaries, and showed that the bubble will not rise at all if where ρ is the difference in density between the fluids inside and outside the bubble.
Abstract: A long bubble of a fluid of negligible viscosity is moving steadily in a tube filled with liquid of viscosity μ at small Reynolds number, the interfacial tension being σ. The angle of contact at the wall is zero. Two related problems are treated here.In the first the tube radius r is so small that gravitational effects are negligible, and theory shows that the speed U of the bubble exceeds the average speed of the fluid in the tube by an amount UW, where (This result is in error by no more than 10% provided ). The pressure drop, P, across such a bubble is given by and W is uniquely determined by conditions near the leading meniscus. The interface near the rear meniscus has a wave-like appearance. This provides a partial theory of the indicator bubble commonly used to measure liquid flowrates in capillaries. A similar theory is applicable to the two-dimensional motion round a meniscus between two parallel plates. Experimental results given here for the value of W agree well neither with theory nor with previous experiments by other workers. No explanation is given for the discrepancies.In the second problem the tube is wider, vertical, and sealed at one end. The bubble now moves under the effect of gravity, but it is shown that it will not rise at all if where ρ is the difference in density between the fluids inside and outside the bubble. If accurate to within 10%. Experiments are adduced in support of these results, though there is disagreement with previous work.
TL;DR: The book describes and explains fundamental physical processes involved in bubbly dynamics and cavitation.
Abstract: Abstract The book describes and explains the fundamental physical processes involved in bubbly dynamics and the phenomenon of cavitation. The study of cavitation and bubbly flow applies to many areas of interest; from valve damage in hydroelectric equipment, ship propellors and internal combustion engines to the performance of turbines and pumps of all sizes,to physiological phenomena such as the cracking of joints and the “bends”
TL;DR: The first analysis of a problem in cavitation and bubble dynamics was made by Rayleigh (1917), who solved the problem of the collapse of an empty cavity in a large mass of liquid.
Abstract: The first analysis of a problem in cavitation and bubble dynamics was made by Rayleigh (1917), who solved the problem of the collapse of an empty cavity in a large mass of liquid. Rayleigh also considered in this same paper the problem of a gas-filled cavity under the assumption that the gas undergoes isothermal com pression. His interest in these problems presumably arose from concern with cavitation and cavitation damage. With neglect of surface tension and liquid viscosity and with the assumption of liquid incompressibility, Rayleigh showed from the momentum equation that the bubble boundary R(t) obeyed the relation RR+W<)2 = p(R)oo, p (1.1)
TL;DR: In this article, approximate solutions for the rate of solution by diffusion of a gas bubble in an undersaturated liquid-gas solution are presented, with the neglect of the translational motion of the bubble.
Abstract: With the neglect of the translational motion of the bubble, approximate solutions may be found for the rate of solution by diffusion of a gas bubble in an undersaturated liquid‐gas solution; approximate solutions are also presented for the rate of growth of a bubble in an oversaturated liquid‐gas solution. The effect of surface tension on the diffusion process is also considered.
TL;DR: In this article, the present state-of-the-art for the estimation of nonadjustable parameters in bubble column reactors is evaluated and a discussion is followed by relevant recommendations for their predictions.
Abstract: Gas-liquid as well as gas-liquid-solid bubble column reactors are extensively used in the chemical industry. This review evaluates the present state of the art for the estimation of “nonadjustable” parameters in bubble column reactors. All the pertinent literature concerning these parameters is discussed and the discussion is followed by relevant recommendations for their predictions. Literature on the modified bubble columns has been incorporated. Finally, the inadeqacies of the data in some areas of practical importance have been pointed out and the recommendations for future work are outlined.