About: Boidae is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 197 publications have been published within this topic receiving 4525 citations. The topic is also known as: boas & boids.
TL;DR: Field data showed that larger diamond pythons took larger mean and maximum prey sizes, whereas prey mass did not correlate significantly with predator size in blacksnakes, and laboratory trials showed that snakes with larger heads could eat larger prey, and eat prey of a given size more rapidly (and using fewer mandibular movements) than could snakes with smaller heads.
Abstract: Field collections of snakes often reveal a correlation between the body size of a snake and the size of its prey. Such a correlation could result from biases in (1) encounter rates with prey items of different sizes (especially in aquatic or creviceforaging species, in which smaller prey may be inaccessible to larger snakes), (2) prey choice, (3) ability to capture or handle prey, or (4) prey-swallowing ability. Field data showed that larger diamond pythons (Morelia spilota Lacapede, Boidae) took larger mean and maximum prey sizes, whereas prey mass did not correlate significantly with predator size in blacksnakes (Pseudechis porphyriacus Shaw, Elapidae). Minimum prey sizes increased little, if at all, in larger snakes of either species. Blacksnakes generally took much smaller prey items than did sympatric pythons. Laboratory trials with these two species showed that snakes with larger heads could eat larger prey, and eat prey of a given size more rapidly (and using fewer mandibular movements) than could snakes with smaller heads. Large blacksnakes were unable to enter narrow crevices to obtain prey items. Pythons could ingest much larger prey items than could blacksnakes. The rate of food intake for blacksnakes of all body sizes was highest with small prey items, whereas pythons (especially larger specimens) were more efficient with larger prey items. This fits well with field observations showing that blacksnakes of all body sizes eat small prey items, whereas pythons (especially larger specimens) consume larger prey items. The relationships between prey and predator size observed in the field are probably due to a combination of factors. Differential encounter rates, active selection of prey sizes and gape limitation may all be important influences on dietary composition in snakes. Key-words: Boidae, Elapidae, gape limitation, optimal foraging, predation, prey choice, prey size, python, snake
TL;DR: Constriction must have been used as a prey-killing tactic very early in the history of snakes and might have been a behavioral "key innovation" in the evolution of their unusual jaw mechanism.
Abstract: Comparative analyses of behavior have an underappreciated potential for revealing the role of ethoecological factors in the origins of higher taxa. Twenty-seven species (13 genera) in the advanced family Colubridae exhibited 19 patterns of coil application; one or two patterns were usually consistent within a genus. Forty-eight species (26 genera) in the primitive families Acrochordidae, Aniliidae, Boidae, and Xenopeltidae usually used a single pattern, despite differences in age, size, shape, habitat, and diet. This implies the shared retention of an action pattern used by their common ancestor no later than the early Paleocene. Constriction must have been used as a prey-killing tactic very early in the history of snakes and might have been a behavioral "key innovation" in the evolution of their unusual jaw mechanism.
TL;DR: A revised taxonomy for the boas and pythons is suggested, significant evidence of discordance between taxonomy and evolutionary relationships in the genera Tropidophis, Morelia, Liasis, and Leiopython is found, and support is found for elevating two previously suggested boid species.
TL;DR: The Caatinga snake assemblage shows high richness and endemism levels, and the results highlight the usefulness of basic natural history data and revision of voucher specimens as baseline information for biogeographic studies and conservation strategies.
Abstract: The present study is a synthesis on snake diversity and distribution in the Caatinga region of northeastern Brazil, providing an updated species list and data on natural history and geographic distribution. Our study is based on the careful revision of 7,102 voucher specimens, housed in 17 herpetological collections, complemented by data on taxonomic literature. We recorded a total of 112 snake species in the Caatinga, belonging to nine families: Anomalepididae, Leptotyphlopidae, Typhlopidae, Aniliidae, Boidae, Viperidae, Elapidae, Colubridae, and Dipsadidae. Our list includes at least 13 never recorded species for this region, as well as distribution records for all species known from the Caatinga (including expansion and new records of distribution). The snake assemblage of the Caatinga is complex, sharing species with other continental open areas (38.4%), forested areas (27.7%), and both open and forested areas (32.1%). The richest areas were isolated plateaus, followed by contact areas, semi-arid caatinga, and sandy dunes of the Sao Franscisco River. We identified 22 Caatinga endemic species with the sandy dunes of Sao Franscico River showing the highest endemism level (12 species, with six endemic species restricted to the area) followed by semi-arid caatinga, and isolated plateaus (eight endemic species each, and six and three endemic species with restricted distribution to each area, respectively). Most species show relatively restricted ranges in parts of the Caatinga. The snake assemblage in Caatinga includes mainly terrestrial species (38.4%), followed by fossorial/cryptozoic (26.8%), arboreal/semi-arboreal (26.8%), and aquatic/semi-aquatic (7.1%) species. Vertebrates are the most important dietary item (80.4%), with 56.6% of species being generalist consumers of this kind of prey; 24.4% are frog-eaters, 7.8% prey on caecilians/amphisbaenians, 6.7% lizard-eaters, 3.3% mammal-eaters, and 1.1% are fish-eaters. Only 18.7% of the snakes eat invertebrate prey, as arthropods, annelids, and mollusks. In relation to time of activity, 35.7% of snakes are both diurnal and nocturnal, 33.0% are strictly nocturnal, and 30.4% are diurnal. The data provided herein increase the list of Caatinga snake species from 50 to 112, and includes detailed maps and information on geographic distribution. The Caatinga snake assemblage shows high richness and endemism levels, and our results highlight the usefulness of basic natural history data and revision of voucher specimens as baseline information for biogeographic studies and conservation strategies.
TL;DR: It is concluded that phylogeny is the most important factor determining structure of this Neotropical assemblage of snakes and a strong ecological component characterizes a peculiar snake fauna in the Cerrado of Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Abstract: To investigate the role of ecological and historical factors in the organization of communities, we describe the ecomorphological structure of an assemblage of snakes (61 species in six families) in the Cerrado (a savanna-like grassland) of Distrito Federal, Brazil. These snakes vary in habits, with some being fossorial, cryptozoic, terrestrial, semi-aquatic, or arboreal. Periods of activity also vary. A multivariate analysis identified distinct morphological groups associated with patterns of resource use. We report higher niche diversification compared to snakes in the Caatinga (a semi-arid region in northeastern Brazil), with fossorial and cryptozoic species occupying morphological space that is not occupied in the Caatinga. Monte Carlo permutations from canonical phylogenetic ordination revealed a significant phylogenetic effect on morphology for Colubridae, Colubrinae, Viperidae, Elapidae, and Boidae indicating that morphological divergence occurred in the distant past. We conclude that phylogeny is the most important factor determining structure of this Neotropical assemblage. Nevertheless, our results also suggest a strong ecological component characterizes a peculiar snake fauna.