TL;DR: Compared with clinic controls, symptoms that are more severe or frequent than expected and of recent onset warrant further diagnostic investigation because they are more likely to be associated with both benign and malignant ovarian masses.
Abstract: ContextWomen with ovarian cancer frequently report symptoms prior to diagnosis,
but distinguishing these symptoms from those that normally occur in women
remains problematic.ObjectiveTo compare the frequency, severity, and duration of symptoms between
women with ovarian cancer and women presenting to primary care clinics.Design, Setting, and PatientsA prospective case-control study of women who visited 2 primary care
clinics (N = 1709) and completed an anonymous survey of symptoms experienced
over the past year (July 2001-January 2002). Severity of symptoms was rated
on a 5-point scale, duration was recorded, and frequency was indicated as
number of episodes per month. An identical survey was administered preoperatively
to 128 women with a pelvic mass (84 benign and 44 malignant).Main Outcome MeasuresComparison of self-reported symptoms between ovarian cancer patients
and women seeking care in primary care clinics.ResultsIn the clinic population, 72% of women had recurring symptoms with a
median number of 2 symptoms. The most common were back pain (45%), fatigue
(34%), bloating (27%), constipation (24%), abdominal pain (22%), and urinary
symptoms (16%). Comparing ovarian cancer cases to clinic controls resulted
in an odds ratio of 7.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-14.2) for increased
abdominal size; 3.6 (95% CI, 1.8-7.0) for bloating; 2.5 (95% CI, 1.3-4.8)
for urinary urgency; and 2.2 (95% CI, 1.2-3.9) for pelvic pain. Women with
malignant masses typically experienced symptoms 20 to 30 times per month and
had significantly more symptoms of higher severity and more recent onset than
women with benign masses or controls. The combination of bloating, increased
abdominal size, and urinary symptoms was found in 43% of those with cancer
but in only 8% of those presenting to primary care clinics.ConclusionsSymptoms that are more severe or frequent than expected and of recent
onset warrant further diagnostic investigation because they are more likely
to be associated with both benign and malignant ovarian masses.
TL;DR: The gastrointestinal and immune effects of SIBO provide a possible unifying framework for understanding frequent observations in IBS, including postprandial bloating and distension, altered motility, visceral hypersensitivity, abnormal brain-gut interaction, autonomic dysfunction, and immune activation.
Abstract: ContextIrritable bowel syndrome (IBS), which affects 11% to 14% of the population,
is a puzzling condition with multiple models of pathophysiology including
altered motility, visceral hypersensitivity, abnormal brain-gut interaction,
autonomic dysfunction, and immune activation. Although no conceptual framework
accounts for all the symptoms and observations in IBS, a unifying explanation
may exist since 92% of these patients share the symptom of bloating regardless
of their predominant complaint.Evidence AcquisitionOvid MEDLINE was searched through May 2004 for relevant English-language
articles beginning with those related to bloating, gas, and IBS. Bibliographies
of pertinent articles and books were also scanned for additional suitable
citations.Evidence SynthesisThe possibility that small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) may
explain bloating in IBS is supported by greater total hydrogen excretion after
lactulose ingestion, a correlation between the pattern of bowel movement and
the type of excreted gas, a prevalence of abnormal lactulose breath test in
84% of IBS patients, and a 75% improvement of IBS symptoms after eradication
of SIBO. Altered gastrointestinal motility and sensation, changed activity
of the central nervous system, and increased sympathetic drive and immune
activation may be understood as consequences of the host response to SIBO.ConclusionsThe gastrointestinal and immune effects of SIBO provide a possible unifying
framework for understanding frequent observations in IBS, including postprandial
bloating and distension, altered motility, visceral hypersensitivity, abnormal
brain-gut interaction, autonomic dysfunction, and immune activation.
TL;DR: With a gluten-free diet, patients have substantial and rapid improvement of symptoms, including symptoms other than the typical ones of diarrhea, steatorrhea, and weight loss.
TL;DR: Compared with baseline values and the control group, SCM-III resulted in a significant increase in lactobacilla, eubacteria and bifidobacteria, which suggests that some selected IBS patients could benefit substantially from symbiotics, but the treatment may need to be given on a cyclic schedule because of the temporary modification of the fecal flora.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Experimental and clinical studies have shown that a novel symbiotic (known as SCM-III) exerts a beneficial effect on gut translocation and local and systemic inflammatory and microbial metabolic parameters. The present investigation was a preliminary trial on the effectiveness of SCM-III for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).
METHODS: Sixty-eight consecutive adult patients with IBS who were free from lactose malabsorption, abdominal surgery, overt psychiatric disorders and ongoing psychotropic drug therapy or ethanol abuse were studied prospectively and divided into 2 groups that were comparable for age, gender, body size, education and pattern of presenting symptoms. The 2 groups were blindly given for 12 weeks either SCM-III 10 mL t.i.d or the same dosage of heat-inactivated symbiotic.
RESULTS: Treatment with SCM-III was ‘effective’ or ‘very effective’ in more than 80% of the patients (P < 0.01 vs baseline values and control). Less than 5% reported ‘not effective’ as the final evaluation compared with over 40% of patients in the control group. After 6 weeks of treatment, a significant improvement of pain and bloating was reported in the treatment group compared with control and baseline values. There was also a benefit for bowel habits, mostly for patients with constipation or alternating bowel habits. No overt clinical or biochemical adverse side-effects were recorded.
CONCLUSION: Compared with baseline values and the control group, SCM-III resulted in a significant increase in lactobacilla, eubacteria and bifidobacteria, which suggests that some selected IBS patients could benefit substantially from symbiotics, but the treatment may need to be given on a cyclic schedule because of the temporary modification of the fecal flora.
TL;DR: Results suggest that the PAGI-SYM is responsive and sensitive to change in clinical status in subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or dyspepsia.
TL;DR: Tolerance depends on the dose and individual sensitivity factors (probably the presence of irritable bowel syndrome or gastroesophageal reflux), and may be an adaptation to chronic consumption.
Abstract: The clinical efficacy of probiotics and prebiotics has been proved in several clinical settings. The authors review their proved or potential side effects. Probiotics as living microorganisms may theoretically be responsible for 4 types of side effects in susceptible individuals: infections, deleterious metabolic activities, excessive immune stimulation, and gene transfer. Very few cases of infection have been observed. These occurred mainly in very sick patients who received probiotic drugs because of severe medical conditions. Prebiotics exert an osmotic effect in the intestinal lumen and are fermented in the colon. They may induce gaseousness and bloating. Abdominal pain and diarrhea only occur with large doses. An increase in gastroesophageal reflux has recently been associated with large daily doses. Tolerance depends on the dose and individual sensitivity factors (probably the presence of irritable bowel syndrome or gastroesophageal reflux), and may be an adaptation to chronic consumption.
TL;DR: Abnormal gastric physiology as measured in this study was not associated with symptoms other than nausea, and significant associations existed between measures of psychiatric distress and digestive symptoms.
Abstract: Introduction: The classification of functional dyspepsia into meaningful subgroups remains an important goal. The aim of this investigation was to determine correlations between dyspeptic symptoms with gastric physiology and psychologic distress. Methods: Consecutive patients with functional dyspepsia were evaluated with electrogastrography (EGG), drink test, and solid phase gastric emptying. Subjects also completed the Nepean Dyspepsia Index, Psychologic General Well-Being Index, SCL-90R, and SF-36. Results: Eighty-one patients were evaluated. Gastric emptying was performed in 29 of 81 patients and was abnormal in 21%, but no correlation existed between symptoms and T 1/2 or T LAG . EGG was abnormal in 42% and drink test was abnormal in 40% of patients. Both were significantly associated with nausea but not with other symptoms. Significant correlations existed with 10 of 15 assessed symptoms and various subscales of the SCL-90R. Somatization was associated with abdominal burning, chest pain, abdominal pressure, abdominal discomfort, bad breath, chest burning, excessive fullness, bloating, abdominal pain, and regurgitation. Anxiety was associated with abdominal burning, chest pain, abdominal pressure, and abdominal discomfort. Anger-hostility was associated with abdominal burning and abdominal pressure. Increased interpersonal sensitivity was associated with abdominal burning and chest burning. SCL-90R Global Symptom Score was associated with abdominal burning, chest pain, abdominal discomfort, and bad breath. Conclusions: Abnormal gastric physiology as measured in this study was not associated with symptoms other than nausea. Significant associations existed between measures of psychiatric distress and digestive symptoms. Symptoms in functional dyspepsia had greater associations with psychologic distress than with commonly employed tests of gastric physiology.
TL;DR: As plans were being made for elective surgery, the patient presented with severe abdominal pain and decreased ostomy output, and a small bowel follow-through study revealed several discrete strictures of the small intestine.
Abstract: The patient is a 49-year-old male diagnosed with Crohn’s disease in 1979. He had Crohn’s colitis at that time, and subsequently underwent a total colectomy with end ileostomy for fulminant disease. In 1982 he underwent completion proctectomy, but he had no further surgery related to his Crohn’s disease for the next 18 years. In January 2000, the patient began to have intermittent, crampy abdominal pain, bloating, and decreased ileostomy output, generally related to dietary indiscretion. These episodes of apparent small-bowel obstruction usually resolved within a 24-hour period. A small bowel follow-through study revealed several discrete strictures of the small intestine (Fig. 1). These findings were similar to those seen on a previous study in 1998. There also was involvement of the terminal ileum with fistulization to the skin near his ileostomy. As plans were being made for elective surgery, the patient presented with severe abdominal pain and decreased ostomy output. He was brought to the operating room for abdominal exploration because of this high-grade acute obstruction.
TL;DR: There is currently no universally effective therapy for IBS, and standard therapy generally involves a symptom-directed approach; anti-diarrhoeal agents for bowel frequency, soluble fibre or laxatives for constipation and smooth muscle relaxants and anti-spasmodics for pain.
Abstract: The irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is part of the spectrum of functional bowel disorders characterised by a diverse consortium of abdominal symptoms including abdominal pain, altered bowel function (bowel frequency and/or constipation), bloating, abdominal distension, the sensation of incomplete evacuation and the increased passage of mucus. It is not surprising therefore that no single, unifying mechanism has as yet been put forward to explain symptom production in IBS. The currently favoured model includes both central and end-organ components which may be combined to create an integrated hypothesis incorporating psychological factors (stress, distress, affective disorder) with end-organ dysfunction (motility disorder, visceral hypersensitivity) possibly aggravated by sub-clinical inflammation as a residuum of an intestinal infection.
There is currently no universally effective therapy for IBS. Standard therapy generally involves a symptom-directed approach; anti-diarrhoeal agents for bowel frequency, soluble fibre or laxatives for constipation and smooth muscle relaxants and anti-spasmodics for pain. New drug development has focused predominantly on agents that modify the effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) in the gut, principally the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for painful diarrhoea predominant IBS and 5-HT4 agonists for constipation predominant IBS. More speculative new therapeutic approaches include anti-inflammatory agents, antibiotics, probiotics, antagonists of CCK1 receptors, tachykinins and other novel neuronal receptors.
TL;DR: Treatment of patients with H. pylori infection and nonulcer dyspepsia (rather than peptic ulcer) is controversial and should be undertaken only when the pathogen has been identified.
Abstract: When no organic cause for dyspepsia is found, the condition generally is considered to be functional, or idiopathic. Nonulcer dyspepsia can cause a variety of symptoms, including abdominal pain, bloating, nausea, and vomiting. Many patients with nonulcer dyspepsia have multiple somatic complaints, as well as symptoms of anxiety and depression. Extensive diagnostic testing is not recommended, except in patients with serious risk factors such as dysphagia, protracted vomiting, anorexia, melena, anemia, or a palpable mass. In these patients, endoscopy should be considered to exclude gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic or duodenal ulcer, and gastric cancer. In patients without risk factors, consideration should be given to empiric therapy with a prokinetic agent (e.g., metoclopramide), an acid suppressant (histamine-H2 receptor antagonist), or an antimicrobial agent with activity against Helicobacter pylori. Treatment of patients with H. pylori infection and nonulcer dyspepsia (rather than peptic ulcer) is controversial and should be undertaken only when the pathogen has been identified. Psychotropic agents should be used in patients with comorbid anxiety or depression. Treatment of nonulcer dyspepsia can be challenging because of the need to balance medical management strategies with treatments for psychologic or functional disease.
TL;DR: Prokinetic drugs such as metoclopramide, domperidone, cisapride, mosapride etc. are the mainstay of therapy in these disorders of gastric motility.
Abstract: Non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), gastritis, diabetic gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia are commonly encountered disorders of gastric motility in clinical practice. Prokinetic drugs such as metoclopramide, domperidone, cisapride, mosapride etc. are the mainstay of therapy in these disorders. These drugs are used to relieve symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, bloating, belching, heartburn, epigastric discomfort etc.
TL;DR: A patient with SSc and insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in whom a diagnosis of CD was made at the age of 49 is described.
Abstract: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a clinically heterogeneous disorder which affects the skin and internal organs such as the gastrointestinal tract, lungs, heart, and kidneys. Small bowel disease can present with a wide variety of symptoms, including intermittent bloating, abdominal cramps, chronic diarrhoea and, in a minority of patients, malabsorption.1 Coeliac disease (CD) is a malabsorptive disorder resulting from inflammatory injury to the mucosa of the small intestine after the ingestion of wheat gluten. As CD has an immunological basis, an association between CD and other autoimmune disorders, such as type 1 diabetes mellitus and autoimmune thyroiditis, is not uncommon.2,3 We describe here a patient with SSc and insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in whom a diagnosis of CD was made at the age of 49. …
TL;DR: It is likely that eosinophil-active cytokines such as interleukin-3 (IL-3), granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IL-5 play pivotal roles in this disease.
Abstract: Eosinophilic gastritis is related to eosinophilic gastroenteritis, varying only in regards to the extent of disease and small bowel involvement. Common symptoms reported are similar to our patient's including: abdominal pain, epigastric pain, anorexia, bloating, weight loss, diarrhea, ankle edema, dysphagia, melaena and postprandial nausea and vomiting. Microscopic features of eosinophilic infiltration usually occur in the lamina propria or submucosa with perivascular aggregates. The disease is likely mediated by eosinophils activated by various cytokines and chemokines. Therapy centers around the use of immunosuppressive agents and dietary therapy if food allergy is a factor. The patient is a 31 year old Caucasian female with a past medical history significant for ulcerative colitis. She presented with recurrent bouts of vomiting, abdominal pain and chest discomfort of 11 months duration. The bouts of vomiting had been reoccurring every 7–10 days, with each episode lasting for 1–3 days. This was associated with extreme weakness and cachexia. Gastric biopsies revealed intense eosinophilic infiltration. The patient responded to glucocorticoids and azathioprine. The differential diagnosis and molecular pathogenesis of eosinophilic gastritis as well as the molecular effects of glucocorticoids in eosinophilic disorders are discussed. The patient responded to a combination of glucocorticosteroids and azathioprine with decreased eosinophilia and symptoms. It is likely that eosinophil-active cytokines such as interleukin-3 (IL-3), granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IL-5 play pivotal roles in this disease. Chemokines such as eotaxin may be involved in eosinophil recruitment. These mediators are downregulated or inhibited by the use of immunosuppressive medications.
TL;DR: Patients who were treated with tegaserod had an overall improvement in IBS symptoms as well as in secondary end points, such as abdominal pain and discomfort, stool consistency, change in bowel movements and relief of bloating.
Abstract: Tegaserod is a drug in a new class of compounds called aminoguanidine indoles and is structurally similar to serotonin (5-HT) with modifications that make the drug selective for the 5-HT(4) receptor Tegaserod has a stimulatory effect on gastrointestinal (GI) motility that has been demonstrated in animal studies and in healthy adults Tegaserod also increases GI secretion and reduces rectal sensitivity Tegaserod is currently approved by the FDA for the treatment of women with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (C-IBS) Eight large Phase III clinical trials involving > 5000 IBS patients support the clinical efficacy of tegaserod in this group of patients Patients who were treated with tegaserod had an overall improvement in IBS symptoms (Subject's Assessment of Global Relief) as well as in secondary end points, such as abdominal pain and discomfort, stool consistency, change in bowel movements and relief of bloating Tegaserod was well-tolerated The most common adverse reaction in clinical trials was diarrhoea, which was usually temporary and mild, although severe diarrhoea requiring hospitalisation has been rarely (< 1%) reported
TL;DR: Tegaserod given in a dose of 6 mg b.d. is effective and well tolerated in IBS-C patients and is equally effective in males and females in relieving the symptoms of abdominal pain, bloating, straining at defecation as well as increased in the mean number of bowel movements per week.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy and tolerability of tegaserod in the treatment of symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) IBS-C patients. DESIGN An open label (quasi interventional) study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY Patients were enrolled between October 2000 and August 2001 at 4 centres (AKUH, Karachi; Mayo Hospital, Lahore; PIMS, Islamabad; Hayatabad Teaching Complex, Peshawar). PATIENTS AND METHODS Tegaserod was administered in a dose of 6 mg (twice-a-day) orally for a period of 6 weeks. Symptoms were assessed before and during treatment using a questionnaire. RESULTS The mean age of patients was 37.5 years and 81(69.2%) were males. The study enrolled 117 patients and 101 patients completed the study. Number of bowel movements, symptoms of straining at defecation, stool consistency, bloating, urgency and abdominal pain improved significantly following treatment (p<0.05). Analysis of data in both genders separately showed statistically significant improvement in symptoms of urgency, straining at defecation, abdominal pain and number of bowel movements following treatment. Side effects of diarrhoea and vertigo (6 and 1 patients respectively) necessitating discontinuation of treatment were infrequent. CONCLUSION Tegaserod given in a dose of 6 mg b.d. is effective and well tolerated in IBS-C patients. It is equally effective in males and females in relieving the symptoms of abdominal pain, bloating, straining at defecation as well as increased in the mean number of bowel movements per week.
TL;DR: The authors recently studied the effect of LGG, which proved to be more effective than placebo in reducing the severity of symptoms and has been described as a "silver bullet" in the treatment of functional abdominal bloating.
Abstract: Functional abdominal bloating is a condition dominated by a feeling of abdominal fullness or bloating and without sufficient criteria for another functional gastrointestinal disorder. The currently used therapeutic approaches aim to reduce the volume of intestinal gas, thus increasing intestinal gas elimination or reducing its production. Some promising results have been obtained by the use of prokinetics, such as tegaserod and Prostigmine, and by the use of nonabsorbable antibiotics, such as rifaximin. Another therapeutic approach is represented by the administration of probiotics to modify the composition of colonic flora and thus the production of intestinal gas. The authors recently studied the effect of LGG, which proved to be more effective than placebo in reducing the severity of symptoms.
TL;DR: SDistinct patterns of pelvic floor dysfunction were identified in patient subgroups with anal incontinence, based on the presence or absence of altered bowel patterns, and Physiologic assessments suggested different pathophysiologic mechanisms among the subgroups.
Abstract: We hypothesized that functional anal incontinence with no structural explanation comprises distinct pathophysiologic subgroups that could be identified on the basis of the predominant presenting bowel pattern. Consecutive patients (n = 80) were prospectively grouped by bowel symptoms as 1) incontinence only, 2) incontinence + constipation, 3) incontinence + diarrhea, and 4) incontinence + alternating bowel symptoms. The Hopkins Bowel Symptom Questionnaire, the Symptom Checklist 90-R, and anorectal manometry were completed. Significant group differences were found between subcategories of incontinent patients on the basis of symptoms. Abdominal pain was more frequent in patients with altered bowel patterns. Patients with alternating symptoms reported the highest prevalence of abdominal pain, rectal pain, and bloating. Basal anal pressures were significantly higher in alternating patients (P = 0.03). Contractile pressures in the distal anal canal were diminished in the incontinent-only and diarrhea groups (P = 0.004). Constipated patients with incontinence exhibited elevated thresholds for the urge to defecate (P = 0.027). Dyssynergia was significantly more frequent in patients with incontinence and constipation or alternating bowel patterns. Distinct patterns of pelvic floor dysfunction were identified in patient subgroups with anal incontinence, based on the presence or absence of altered bowel patterns. Physiologic assessments suggested different pathophysiologic mechanisms among the subgroups. The evaluation of patients with fecal incontinence should consider altered bowel function.
TL;DR: Tegaserod has been safely employed in clinical trials where it has demonstrated efficacy in normalizing intestinal function, thereby improving irritable bowel syndrome symptoms.
Abstract: Activation of serotonin 5-HT 4 receptors has been proposed as treatment for irritable bowel syndrome, a common, complex and distressing gastrointestinal disorder. Abnormal intestinal motility and sensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome patients can result in diarrhea, constipation, abdominal pain, bloating, headache and fatigue; these and other symptoms can lead to exacerbation of psychological stress, which may in turn induce further physiological abnormalities and patient discomfort. The serotonin agonist tegaserod binds with high affinity to 5-HT 4 receptors and has demonstrated potent pharmacological effects on the mid- and distal gut. Tegaserod has been safely employed in clinical trials where it has demonstrated efficacy in normalizing intestinal function, thereby improving irritable bowel syndrome symptoms.
TL;DR: The state of hidden constipation seems to bear a cumulative risk of developing organic diseases like diverticula, polyps, haemorrhoids and malignancy over the years, and defaecation disorders (functional faecal retention) is confirmed by a significant reduction in symptoms and physical signs after a propulsive regimen.
Abstract: Introduction: The study was undertaken to test a hypothesis of coexistence and causality between abdominal and recto-anal symptoms and physical signs. Material and methods: A random sample of 251 patients was drawn from 645 referred patients from 12th September 1988 to 19th January 1999. Nineteen selected symptoms were recorded; abdominal palpation and ano-rectoscopy were with special reference to identify faecal reservoirs. Barium enema was used to demonstrate colon pathology. After a combined prokinetic regimen, symptoms and signs were reassessed. The study was observational and factor analysis was used to explore the data together with testing after cross tabulations. Results: One hundred and fiftynine patients were female (63%); neither bloating (64%), abdominal pressure (60%) and pain (26%) nor right iliac fossa tenderness (58%) and faecal mass (42%) and meteorism (33%) were related to age. Patients with additional diverticula and haemorrhoids were significantly older than patients without these lesions. Bloating was found together with a reservoir of faeces in ano-rectum in 62% of patients and 51% had haemorrhoids grade 2 or more and 50% had bloating, faeces in rectum and a right sided palpable abdominal mass (additional faecal reservoir). Among 17 factors explaining 68% of the variance in 45 variables, frequent abdominal and ano-rectal symptoms and physical signs showed substantial correlations to nine factors, indicating that they belong to the same underlying condition. A malignant tumour was found in four patients, polyps in 20 patients, and in 105 patients left sided diverticula were present. After a prokinetic regimen was conducted the dominant symptoms and signs were reduced significantly. Conclusions: Collectively, the data showed significant correlations between abdominal and anorectal symptoms and signs. Additional faecal reservoirs were demonstrated in the right colon and the rectum, irrespective of defaecation daily. This hidden constipation (faecal retention) gives rise to bloating, pain and right iliac fossa tenderness and mass, and defaecation disorders (functional faecal retention) which was confirmed by a significant reduction in symptoms and physical signs after a propulsive regimen. Also, over the years, the state of hidden constipation seems to bear a cumulative risk of developing organic diseases like diverticula, polyps, haemorrhoids and malignancy. Dan Med Bull 2004;51:422-5.
TL;DR: Through a proper understanding of the diagnostic criteria, pathophysiology and treatment options, this disorder can be treated effectively in many patients.
Abstract: Irritable bowel syndrome represents a common gastrointestinal disorder that significantly impacts patients' lives. It is defined by Rome II criteria and characterized by abdominal pain and bloating associated with changes in bowel habit. Visceral hypersensitivity is currently considered a biological marker for the disease. Current therapeutic treatments include the use of fiber supplements, antidiarrheal agents, laxatives, antispasmodics, tricyclic antidepressants and serotonergic agents. Through a proper understanding of the diagnostic criteria, pathophysiology and treatment options, this disorder can be treated effectively in many patients.
TL;DR: Therapeutically, cisapride seemed to be superior to acidreducing drugs but in a non significant manner, whereas the most frequent symptoms of the condition were nausea, vomiting, belching, bloating and postprandial fullness.
Abstract: marginally better than those who received ranitidine Conclusions: The frequency of functional dyspepsia in childhood reached a percentage of 70% The majority of patients exhibited mild disease manifestations whereas the most frequent symptoms of the condition were nausea, vomiting, belching, bloating and postprandial fullness Therapeutically, cisapride seemed to be superior to acidreducing drugs but in a non significant manner
TL;DR: The authors found that upper GI symptoms such as early satiety, indigestion, and bloating were more common in IBS-C patients compared toIBS-D patients, and suggest that exaggerated "cologastric brake" may partially explain upper abdominal symptoms in IBD patients.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the bloating behavior of a commercial bone china body during biscuit firing using XRD and SEM techniques, and the resultant microstructures were investigated using a special etching technique to observe the microstructural evolution of the body with changing firing regime.
TL;DR: The preliminary data of two patients indicates that osteopathic treatment may help, however, the results are inconclusive due to an insufficient patient population and inadequate study design, which highlights the need for further research of a larger scale, longer-term, randomised, controlled study.
Abstract: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common gastrointestinal (GI) disorder seen by healthcare professionals, yet, effective treatment is lacking. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of osteopathic treatment on IBS. Two IBS patients were recruited and received osteopathic treatment over four consecutive weeks at Victoria University Osteopathic Medicine Clinic. The patients were assessed by the Bowel Symptom Scale (BSS) at the pre, mid and post treatment points. Subjects showed varied results throughout the study, however by the end of the study both patients showed a decrease in their overall severity of symptoms. Improvements did occur in the patients' individual presenting symptoms, where abdominal pain, bloating and diarrhoea were all reduced. The preliminary data of two patients indicates that osteopathic treatment may help. However, the results are inconclusive due to an insufficient patient population and inadequate study design. This highlights the need for further research of a larger scale, longer-term , randomised, controlled study.
This minor thesis was written by a post-graduate student as part of the requirements of the Master of Health Science (Osteopathy) program.
TL;DR: Specific subjective symptoms for GERD in clinical dyspepsia-like ulcer were severe epigastric pain and absence of bloating and the proportion of such symptoms in ulcer like dyspeptia could assist clinical diagnosis of GERD.
Abstract: Background : The Aim of study is to identify specific subjective symptoms for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), GERD proportion in ulcer like dyspepsia and the correlation between specific subjective symptoms for GERD and endoscopic examination Result in ulcer like dyspepsia Methods : A cross-sectional study was conducted in 67 patients with ulcer like dyspepsia. The patient’s history of illness was taken, and physical and endoscopic examinations were performed. A questionnaire on dyspepsia symptoms was completed. Data analysis was performed to identify the correlation between subjective symptoms and endoscopic examination results using chi-square test. T test was performed to determine the correlation between dyspepsia scores and endoscopic results. Result : Subjective symptoms that correlated with endoscopic results were severe epigastric pain (p=0.080) and the absence of bloating (p=0.055). Dyspepsia scores did not correlate with endoscopic examination results (p=0.725). Conclusion : Specific subjective symptoms for GERD in clinical dyspepsia-like ulcer were severe epigastric pain and absence of bloating. The proportion of such symptoms in ulcer like dyspepsia could assist clinical diagnosis of GERD. Keywords : GERD, symptom, dyspepsia
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed a method for providing relief from pain and discomfort associated with colic, including bloating, crying, gas, cramping, regurgitation, diarrhea and gastrointestinal pain, consisting of antiflatulent, at least one histamine H1-receptor antagonist, and optionally, one or more prebiotic and/or one probiotic.
Abstract: Compositions and methods for providing relief from pain and/or discomfort associated with gastrointestinal disorders, including, for example, bloating, crying, gas, cramping, regurgitation, diarrhea and gastrointestinal pain, associated with colic comprising, at least one antiflatulent, at least one histamine H1-receptor antagonist, and optionally,one or more prebiotic and/or one or more probiotic.
TL;DR: Nissen fundoplication remains one of the three most common major surgical procedures performed in infants and children, however, despite its unquestioned value in preventing reflux and emesis,fundoplication is far from being an uncomplicated procedure.
Abstract: Nissen fundoplication remains one of the three most common major surgical procedures performed in infants and children. However, despite its unquestioned value in preventing reflux and emesis, fundoplication is far from being an uncomplicated procedure. Dyspeptic symptoms such as fullness, early satiety, abdominal pain, or bloating may occur in up to 30% of patients who undergo surgery [4].
TL;DR: Application of more sophisticated and discriminating diagnostic tests (intestinal manometry, barostat, etc.) and histology increasingly showed that Gastrointestinal motility and perception disorders re-visited.
Abstract: The importance of gastrointestinal motility and gut perception in medicine has been long recognized. Physiologically, these key functions ensure normal unperceived feeding and digestion, crucial aspects of health and wellbeing. Conversely, pathophysiological disturbances may produce digestive symptoms, which are common in the general population and may range from the simply annoying to the incapacitating. In fact, major disturbances may lead to malnourishment, metabolic imbalance and general deterioration of the body. Altered normal gut motility may also disrupt gut homeostasis, induce changes in the gut flora and facilitate bacterial translocation from the intestine to other viscera (Fig. 1). Clinical recognition of gastrointestinal motility and perception disorders is largely based on the anatomic localization of their symptomatic expression (1-4). Thus, dysphagia, reflux symptoms and chest pain are normally associated with esophageal or gastroesophageal disturbances. Upper abdominal pain or discomfort, early satiety, nausea and vomiting, and other dyspeptic-like symptoms are usually ascribed to dysfunction of the stomach and/or upper small bowel. Bloating is a somewhat mysterious symptom that may be generated by motor/sensorial disturbances throughout the gastrointestinal tract. Diarrhea and/or constipation usually result from small bowel and/or colonic disorders. Ano-rectal symptoms usually derive from dysfunction of the pelvic floor, distal colon or sphincteric structures. Traditionally, clinical conditions were divided into somatic gastrointestinal motility disorders: achalasia, gastroparesis, chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction and so on, and functional disorders: dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome and a myriad of clinical syndromes and descriptions. The distinction between both groups was largely based on whether a propulsive failure was or not demonstrated by conventional imaging tests. Thus, a patient with recurrent abdominal pain and distension could be categorized either as a chronic intestinal pseudoobstruction (if dilated loops of bowel were visualized on Xrays) or irritable bowel syndrome (if nothing obviously abnormal was found). Application of more sophisticated and discriminating diagnostic tests (intestinal manometry, barostat, etc.) and histology increasingly showed that Gastrointestinal motility and perception disorders re-visited