TL;DR: The argument is made that somesthesia is not strictly passive process, and its central neuronal mechanisms cannot be studied in all their complexity and subtlety by applying passive stimuli to uninterested or unconscious animals.
Abstract: The argument is made that somesthesia is not strictly passive process, and its central neuronal mechanisms cannot be studied in all their complexity and subtlety by applying passive stimuli to uninterested or unconscious animals. The case is clear for kinesthesia. Peripheral proprioceptive signals are altered by active muscle contractions, and the central mechanisms of kinesthetic sensations should be studied during active movements. A similar case can be made for tactile discrimination. Ascending tactile afferents are subject to modulation during movement. Moreover, the generation of a central neural representation of the mechanical stimulus is only part of the tactile perceptual process. It is also influenced by the behavioral, attentive, and motivational state of the animal, whose effects can only be revealed in awake animals actively participating in discrimination tasks.
TL;DR: These findings demonstrate that the central nervous system is capable of assembling complex spatio‐temporal patterns of nociceptive information from the body surface into unified mental objects with sufficient accuracy to enable behavioral discrimination.
Abstract: The exteroceptive capabilities of the nociceptive system have long been thought to be considerably more limited than those of the tactile system. However, most investigations of spatio-temporal aspects of the nociceptive system have largely focused on intensity coding as consequence of spatial or temporal summation. Graphesthesia, the identification of numbers "written" on the skin, and assessment of the two-point discrimination thresholds were used to compare the exteroceptive capabilities of the tactile and nociceptive systems. Numbers were "written" on the forearm and the abdomen by tactile stimulation and by painful non-contact infrared laser heat stimulation. Subjects performed both graphesthesia tasks better than chance. The tactile graphesthesia tasks were performed with 89% (82-97%) correct responses on the forearm and 86% (79-94%) correct responses on the abdomen. Tactile graphesthesia tasks were significantly better than painful heat graphesthesia tasks that were performed with 31% (23-40%) and 44% (37-51%) correct responses on the forearm and abdomen, respectively. These findings demonstrate that the central nervous system is capable of assembling complex spatio-temporal patterns of nociceptive information from the body surface into unified mental objects with sufficient accuracy to enable behavioral discrimination.
TL;DR: The specialization of the hand with respect to the sensory mechanisms that contribute to the authors' awareness of finger position, movement, and force is reviewed, and experimental evidence indicating the critical role played by muscle spindle receptors in proprioception is described.
Abstract: The basic sensory mechanisms involved in transducing information concerning the spatial properties of objects and the movements and forces generated by the hand are briefly reviewed. The contributi...
TL;DR: The patient's left hand clumsiness is probably due to the disturbance of kinesthesia, which is crucial to activate temporo-spatial patterns of complex hand and finger movements as well as to maintain long sequences of simple motor execution without vision.
Abstract: We described a 48-year-old, right-handed woman who manifested left hand clumsiness after damage to the dorsal column of the high cervical cord due to probable multiple sclerosis. On February 29, 1996, she developed a weakness in the right limbs. Subsequently, she suffered numbness and clumsiness in the left limbs, even though muscle strength of the left limbs was preserved. Seventeen days later, she was referred to our hospital. A T2-weighted MRI after admission demonstrated high signal intensities in the left dorsal column and the right antero-lateral part of the cervical cord at the C1 to C3 vertebral level. Under the diagnosis of probable multiple sclerosis, steroid pulse therapy was applied twice and she gradually regained muscle strength in the right limbs and sensation in the left limbs. One month later, elemental sensations such as pain, touch, temperature, vibration, and position, as well as discriminative sensations such as localization sensation, two-point discrimination, barognosis, pinch-press discrimination, and graphesthesia in the left limbs returned to normal. However, her left hand remained clumsy, especially when she tried to manipulate objects. She also showed a great difficulty in sustaining a constant level of pinching force by the left thumb and index finger, and in localizing her right thumb placed in space with the left hand with her eyes closed. She stated herself that she could not sense at all how her left hand and fingers were moving. Somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the right scalp showed that the NI was poorly organized and the patency of subsequent peaks was delayed. Transcranial magnetic stimulation revealed that the pyramidal tract from the right motor cortex to the left cervical cord was functionally intact. These observations lead us to conclude as follows: (1) the patient's left hand clumsiness is probably due to the disturbance of kinesthesia, which is crucial to activate temporo-spatial patterns of complex hand and finger movements as well as to maintain long sequences of simple motor execution without vision; and (2) kinesthesia is a specific sensation that is presumably conveyed by the dorsal columns and could be selectively affected by a cervical cord lesion.