Scispace (Formerly Typeset)
  1. Home
  2. Topics
  3. Authentication protocol
  4. 1986
  1. Home
  2. Topics
  3. Authentication protocol
  4. 1986
Showing papers on "Authentication protocol published in 1986"
Journal Article•10.1109/TSE.1986.6312985•
Mechanical verification and automatic implementation of communication protocols

[...]

T. P. Blumer, D. P. Sidhu
01 Aug 1986-IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
TL;DR: An automated technique for protocol development is discussed along with its application to the specification, verification, and semiautomatic implementation of an authentication protocol for computer networks.
Abstract: An automated technique for protocol development is discussed along with its application to the specification, verification, and semiautomatic implementation of an authentication protocol for computer networks. An overview is given of the specification language, implementation method, and software tools used with this technique. The authentication protocol is described, along with an example of its operation. The reachability analysis technique for the verification of some protocol properties is discussed, and protocol verification software that uses this technique is described. The results of mechanical verification of some properties of this protocol are presented with a partial implementation generated automatically from the protocol specification.

52 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/0169-7552(86)90004-8•
Authentication protocols for computer networks: I

[...]

Deepinder P. Sidhu1•
Iowa State University1
01 Apr 1986-Computer Networks and Isdn Systems
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors apply state machine modeling and analysis techniques to determine important properties of encryption-based protocols including completeness, deadlock freeness, livelock or tempo-blocking freenness, termination, boundedness, and absence of non-executable interactions.
Abstract: Specifications of encryption-based protocols using conventional and public-key encryption schemes are discussed for authentication of users or systems in a computer network environment. The protocols treat a sender and a receiver symmetrically and make no assumption about any specific time ordering of events. We apply state machine modeling and analysis techniques to determine important properties of these protocols including completeness, deadlock freeness, livelock or tempo-blocking freeness, termination, boundedness, and absence of non-executable interactions.

24 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/0167-4048(86)90052-0•
Authentication and discretionary access control in computer networks

[...]

Paul A. Karger
01 Dec 1986-Computers & Security
TL;DR: Girling's strategy for one-time keywords for authentication forwarding is combined with a proxy login mechanism to obtain a reliable method for network authentication that does not depend on the transmission of passwords.

23 citations

Book Chapter•10.1007/3-540-39805-8_31•
The practice of authentication

[...]

Gustavus J. Simmons1•
Sandia National Laboratories1
1 Jan 1986
TL;DR: The need to authenticate information presupposes an opponent(s) — who may in some circumstances be either the transmitter or receiver — that desires to have unauthentic messages be accepted by the receiver, or by arbiters, as authentic or else to fraudulently attribute to the transmitter messages that he did not send.
Abstract: One of the most pervasive problems in military and in commercial communications-like systems is the need to authenticate digital messages; where authentication is interpreted broadly to mean verification both that a message was originated by the purported transmitter and that it has not been altered subsequently, which includes verifying that it is not a repetition of an earlier legitimate but already accepted message The terminology ttmessagetl is a carryover from the origins of the problem in communications systems, but as used here includes resident computer software, data bank information, access requests and passes or passwords, hand-shaking exchanges between terminals and central facilities or between card readers and teller machines, etc; ie, digital information exchange over a suspect channel or interface in general The need to authenticate information presupposes an opponent(s) — who may in some circumstances be either the transmitter or receiver — that desires to have unauthentic messages be accepted by the receiver, or by arbiters, as authentic or else to fraudulently attribute to the transmitter messages that he did not send

16 citations

Journal Article•
Authentication Protocols for Computer Networks: I.

[...]

Deepinder P. Sidhu
01 Jan 1986-Computer Networks
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors apply state machine modeling and analysis techniques to determine important properties of encryption-based protocols including completeness, deadlock freeness, livelock or tempo-blocking freenness, termination, boundedness, and absence of non-executable interactions.

13 citations

Journal Article•10.1016/0167-7136(86)90044-2•
Authentication protocols for computer networks: I

[...]

Deepinder P. Sidhu
01 Sep 1986-Computer Compacts
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors apply state machine modeling and analysis techniques to determine important properties of encryption-based protocols including completeness, deadlock freeness, livelock or tempo-blocking freenness, termination, boundedness, and absence of non-executable interactions.

12 citations

Proceedings Article•10.2514/6.1986-2760•
Computer security and user authentication - Old problems, new solutions

[...]

J.-C. Spender
2 Dec 1986

1 citations

Proceedings Article•10.1109/SP.1986.10009•
A Global Authentication Service without Global Trust

[...]

Andrew D. Birrell, Butler W. Lampson, Roger M. Needham, Michael D. Schroeder
7 Apr 1986
TL;DR: A UID scheme that gives clients control over the time at which a name gets bound to a principal, thus controlling the effects of mutability of the name space is provided.
Abstract: This paper describes a design for an authentication service for a very large scale, very long lifetime, distributed system. The paper introduces a methodology for describing authentication protocols that makes explicit the trust relationships amongst the participants. The authentication protocol is based on the primitive notion of composition of secure channels. The authentication model offered provides for the authentication of "roles", where a principal might exercise differing roles at differing times, whilst having only a single "identity". Roles are suitable for inclusion in access control lists. The naming of a role implies what entities are being trusted to authenticate the role. We provide a UID scheme that gives clients control over the time at which a name gets bound to a principal, thus controlling the effects of mutability of the name space.
Proceedings Article•10.1109/SP.1986.10022•
A More Efficient Cryptographic Matchmaking Protocol for Use in the Absence of a Continuously Available Third Party

[...]

Catherine Meadows1•
United States Naval Research Laboratory1
7 Apr 1986
TL;DR: This paper constructs a protocol in which users can verify whether they have matching credentials without revealing their credentials to each other unless there is a match, which is useful in situations in which a trusted third party exists but is not available to all users at all times.
Abstract: The problem of authentication of mutually suspicious parties is one that is becoming more and more important with the proliferation of distributed systems. In this paper we construct a protocol in which users can verify whether they have matching credentials without revealing their credentials to each other unless there is a match. Thk protocol requires a trusted third party, but does not require it to be available to the users except when they sign up for the system. Thus it is useful in situations in which a trusted third party exists, but is not available to all users at all times.

Tools

SciSpace AgentBiomedical AgentSciSpace RecruitSciSpace for EnterpriseAgent GalleryChat with PDFLiterature ReviewAI WriterFind TopicsParaphraserCitation GeneratorExtract DataAI DetectorCitation Booster

Learn

ResourcesLive Workshops

SciSpace

CareersSupportBrowse PapersPricingSciSpace Affiliate ProgramCancellation & Refund PolicyTermsPrivacyData Sources

Directories

PapersTopicsJournalsAuthorsConferencesInstitutionsCitation StylesWriting templates

Extension & Apps

SciSpace Chrome ExtensionSciSpace Mobile App

Contact

support@scispace.com
SciSpace

© 2026 | PubGenius Inc. | Suite # 217 691 S Milpitas Blvd Milpitas CA 95035, USA

soc2
Secured by Delve