About: Arithmetico-geometric sequence is a research topic. Over the lifetime, 131 publications have been published within this topic receiving 4034 citations.
TL;DR: The best lower bound known is due to Berlekamp as discussed by the authors, who showed that/(n) < nl9 for n prime. But this lower bound is extremely poor and cannot be improved by Erdös, Rado and Schmidt.
Abstract: In 1926 van der Waerden [13] proved the following startling theorem : If the set of integers is arbitrarily partitioned into two classes then at least one class contains arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions. It is well known and obvious that neither class must contain an infinite arithmetic progression. In fact, it is easy to see that for any sequence an there is another sequence bn9 with bn > an9 which contains no arithmetic progression of three terms, but which intersects every infinite arithmetic progression. The finite form of van der Waerden's theorem goes as follows: For each positive integer n9 there exists a least integer f{n) with the property that if the integers from 1 to /(/?) are arbitrarily partitioned into two classes, then at least one class contains an arithmetic progression of « terms. (For a short proof, see the note of Graham and Rothschild [5].) However, the best upper bound on f{n) known at present is extremely poor. The best lower bound known, due to Berlekamp [3], asserts that/(«) < nl9 for n prime, which improves previous results of Erdös, Rado and W. Schmidt. More than 40 years ago, Erdös and Turân [4] considered the quantity rk{n)9 defined to be the greatest integer / for which there is a sequence of integers 0 < a\\ < a2 < ••• < a; ^ n which does not contain an arithmetic progression of k terms. They were led to the investigation of rk{n) by several things. First of all the problem of estimating rk{n) is clearly interesting in itself. Secondly, rk{n) < n/2 would imply f{k) < 77, i.e., they hoped to improve the poor upper bound on f{k) by investigating rk{n). Finally, an old question in number theory asks if there are arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions of prime numbers. From rk{n) < %{rì) this would follow immediately. The hope was that this problem on primes could be attacked not by
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a method to solve the problem of "without abstractions" without abstractions, which they call "without Abstract" and "Without Abstract" (without Abstract).
TL;DR: The proof of van der Waerden's theorem as discussed by the authors uses multiple nested inductions, which result in extremely weak bounds for N{h,k] such that every subset of a set of positive integers must have at least one arithmetic progression of length k.
Abstract: lfh and k are positive integers there exists N(h, k) such that whenever N ^ N(h, k), and the integers 1,2,...,N are divided into h subsets, at least one must contain an arithmetic progression of length k. This is the famous theorem of van der Waerden [10], dating from 1927. The proof of this uses multiple nested inductions, which result in extremely weak bounds for N{h,k). We shall define Bk to be the collection of all sets si £= N for which sf contains no arithmetic progression of length k. We then set
TL;DR: In this paper, the occurrence of almost-primes in arithmetic progressions and in short intervals was investigated, and it correspond to two well-known conjectures concerning prime numbers, namely, if (l, k) = 1, there exists a prime p satisfying
Abstract: In this paper we shall investigate the occurrence of almost-primes in arithmetic progressions and in short intervals. These problems correspond to two well-known conjectures concerning prime numbers. The first conjecture is that, if (l, k) = 1, there exists a prime p satisfying