TL;DR: In this first-ever critical review of the subject, careful consideration of engineering principles and large-scale experimental studies indicate that the relevance and prominence of arc mapping as a leading indicator of fire origin have been notably overstated.
Abstract: Arc mapping is a method for graphically documenting a fire pattern which comprises arc marks on the wiring of a structure due to the effects of fire, with the goal of using this information to assist in establishing the area of origin of the fire. The concept was initially presented in 1955, but without any published science (experimental, theoretical, or modeling) basis. By the 1990s, the method was being widely used by fire investigators. Meanwhile, the first paper containing substantive research did not appear until 2005. In this first-ever critical review of the subject, careful consideration of engineering principles and large-scale experimental studies on the subject indicate that the relevance and prominence of arc mapping as a leading indicator of fire origin have been notably overstated. The technique is valid and applicable only in some very limited scenarios. Yet it has seen increased use in recent years by investigators preparing fire reports. In many cases, such attempted use of arc mapping is based on incorrect and invalid hypotheses, which are often implicitly assumed to be true instead of being explicitly stated. Fire patterns are subdivided into directionality (movement) patterns and intensity patterns. Analysis of the research indicates that valid conditions can be expected for use of arc mapping as a directionality indicator in less than 1% of building wiring circuits which sustain arcing. For intensity patterns created by arc sites, propensity is governed by three main variables: fuel loading, ventilation, and burning duration. Only the last is potentially associated with a location being the area of fire origin. But experiments show that fuel and ventilation effects are likely to dominate, instead. In the best-documented study so far, only 23% of arc beads were found to be located near the area of origin, while 61% were found at areas of heavy fuel concentration. This indicates that, in the general case, arc mapping results cannot be used to draw conclusions as to the fire origin. Only in rare cases where it might be demonstrated that fuel concentration or ventilation effects were not governing, would it be possible to use arc mapping results as pointers to the area of fire origin. Since arc mapping is used almost exclusively for forensic purposes, it must be emphasized that methods should not be used, unless it can be demonstrated that they are reliable indicators of what is claimed, and that they are being used properly.
TL;DR: In this paper, a full-scale fire test was conducted on a kitchen arrangement containing a refrigerator, dishwasher, and electric clothes dryer, and the fire was ignited by a heat source external to the appliances.
Abstract: A full-scale fire test was conducted on a kitchen arrangement containing a refrigerator, dishwasher, and electric clothes dryer. The fire was ignited by a heat source external to the appliances. Post fire analysis established the presence of arc faults on the appliances’ internal electrical wiring. This fire test establishes that while faults indicate that the appliances were energized when attacked by fire, they are not necessarily indicators that the fire originated inside the appliance. This fire test also demonstrates that an arc mapping analysis of an appliance requires knowledge of the internal configuration of the appliance and its wiring.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss about the tool arc mapping which is used to identify the fire area of origin where fire involves electrical systems and this paper focuses on the possibility of arcs in the circuits which is energized and drawing power, energised and not drawing power and unenergized circuits.
Abstract: The fire accidents often happen in the residential and commercial structures. The investigation of fire in the accident site is a complex process and there is a difficulty in identifying the cause of fire. The commonly encountered problem in fire investigation is the false statements of witness information, hidden evidences and insufficient data provided by the occupier of the premises. The investigation of fire accident done by the corresponding authority should follow a procedural method. The effective investigation results in accurate determination of cause of fire and other factors that led to the spread of fire. There are several investigation tools and techniques used for fire investigation such as Fire Pattern analysis, Heat and Flame Vector analysis, Depth of Char and Calcination Survey, Arc Mapping and Fire Dynamics. This paper discusses about the tool arc mapping which is used to identify the fire area of origin where fire involves electrical systems and this paper focuses on the possibility of arcs in the circuits which is energized and drawing power, energized and not drawing power and un-energized circuits. How the identification of arcs in the electrical line diagram of accident sites helps to determine the fire area of origin is also discussed. The differentiation between melting of wire and arcing between wires is illustrated as per NFPA 921. The possibility of number of arcs in the three phase system is more than single phase system. The different types of arc formations in the three phase electrical supply system are explained in this paper.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the limits of arc mapping as an indicator of fire origin and raise concerns about arc-related artifacts, distinguishing cause from victim beads, visual vs. microscopic examinations, and even practitioner qualifications.
Abstract: Expert fire investigators know the limits of arc mapping as an indicator of fire origin. Concerns about arc mapping are on the rise.
There are doubts associated with arc-related artifacts, distinguishing “cause” from “victim” beads, visual vs. microscopic examinations, and even practitioner qualifications. Specific noteworthy complaints include: (1) overpromises on the technique’s precision, (2) exaggerated inferences from the available data, (3) failure to adequately account for potential methodological flaws, (4) deficient scientific rigor in establishing evidentiary fire origin-related reliability, (5) errors due to deficient practitioner training and experience, and (6) indeterminate findings based upon subjective visual analysis. An emerging industry of pseudoscientific expert witnesses compounds these problems. Untrustworthy and invalid fire-related arc mapping clothed as forensic science continues to invade the courtroom.
TL;DR: The latest peer-reviewed research and discussions on the implications of increased use of ground- and arc-fault circuit interrupters on arc mapping analysis are presented.
Abstract: NFPA 921 Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations considers the technique arc mapping to be one of the methodologies used in isolating a fire’s origin and spread. Provided the technique is used properly and understanding its limitations, it is a tool for investigators. Synthesized here is the latest peer-reviewed research and discussions on the implications of increased use of ground- and arc-fault circuit interrupters on arc mapping analysis. Incorporated are case studies and evaluations of recent legal decisions. The goal is to arm investigators with what’s needed to maximize the arc mapping’s efficacy and best present its use and results.