Anticachexia

Abstract: BACKGROUND Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial debilitating syndrome that directly accounts for more than 20% of cancer deaths while there is no effective therapeutic approach for treatment of cancer cachexia. Carnosol (CS) is a bioactive diterpene compound present in Lamiaceae spp., which has been demonstrated to have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer properties. But its effects on cancer cachexia and the possible mechanism remain a mystery. METHODS The in vitro cell models of C2C12 myotube atrophy and 3T3-L1 mature adipocyte lipolysis were used to check the activities of CS and its synthesized analogues. C26 tumour-bearing BALB/c mice were applied as the animal model to examine their therapeutic effects on cancer cachexia in vivo. Levels of related signal proteins in both in vitro and in vivo experiments were examined using western blotting to study the possible mechanisms. RESULTS Carnosol and its analogues [dimethyl-carnosol (DCS) and dimethyl-carnosol-D6 (DCSD)] alleviated myotube atrophy of C2C12 myotubes and lipolysis of 3T3-L1 adipocytes in vitro. Interestingly, CS and its analogues exhibited stronger inhibitive effects on muscle atrophy induced by tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (CS, P < 0.001; DCS, P < 0.001; DCSD, P < 0.001) in C2C12 myoblasts than on muscle atrophy induced by IL-6 (CS, P < 0.05; DCS, P = 0.08; DCSD, P < 0.05). In a C26 tumour-bearing mice model, administration of CS or its analogue DCSD significantly prevented body weight loss without affecting tumour size. At the end of the experiment, the body weight of mice treated with CS and DCSD was significantly increased by 11.09% (P < 0.01) and 11.38% (P < 0.01) compared with that of the C26 model group. CS and DCSD also improved the weight loss of epididymal adipose tissue in C26 model mice by 176.6% (P < 0.01) and 48.2% (P < 0.05) increase, respectively. CS and DCSD treatment partly preserved gastrocnemius myofibres cross-sectional area. CS treatment decreased the serum level of TNF-α (-95.02%, P < 0.01) but not IL-6 in C26 tumour-bearing mice. Inhibition on NF-κB and activation of Akt signalling pathway were involved in the ameliorating effects of CS and its analogues on muscle wasting both in vitro and in vivo. CS and its analogues also alleviated adipose tissue loss by inhibiting NF-κB and AMPK signalling pathways both in vitro and in vivo. CONCLUSIONS CS and its analogues exhibited anticachexia effects mainly by inhibiting TNF-α/NF-κB pathway and decreasing muscle and adipose tissue loss. CS and its analogues might be promising drug candidates for the treatment of cancer cachexia.

Abstract: In view of the postulated role of cathepsin D in cachexia, investigations have been pursued on the host tissue response of cathepsin D activity in DBA/2 mice inoculated with 5 × 105 L1210 tumor cells. The results confirmed previous investigators' findings of the increase in cathepsin D activity (specific activity) in liver and muscle of tumor bearers. In addition, it was found that this increase was a general response of the host since heart, kidney, lung, and spleen cathepsin D specific activity were also enhanced in tumor bearers. These increases ranged from an average of 10% for spleen to 100% for gastrocnemius muscle. This effect was age related in heart and kidney. As a working hypothesis, we propose the concept that tumor bearers release protease-enhancing factor(s) which trigger increase or enhancement of cathepsin D activity in host tissues by yet unknown mechanisms. Pepstatin (60 mg/kg), a known inhibitor of cathepsin D in vitro , was shown to provide long-lasting inhibition (3 to 6 days) of cathepsin D in vivo in non-tumor bearers particularly in spleen, liver, kidney, lung, and heart. Evidence is provided from assays of cell fractions that this inhibition takes place at or in the lysosome. The duration of the effectiveness of pepstatin was altered in tumor bearers in that cathepsin D activity of heart, lung, and spleen had returned to near normal values in 48 hr following pepstatin injection. However, in muscle, liver, and kidney, significant inhibition (90%) still persisted in tumor bearers as it did in non-tumor bearers. Pepstatin or related antiproteases may prove useful as “anticachexia” agents by decreasing proteolysis in muscle and other tissues.

Abstract: Tumor necrosis factor may be a mediator of the syndrome of cancer cachexia. Tachyphylaxis or tolerance to the cachectic effects of recombinant tumor necrosis factor (rTNF) has been previously described. In this study, we investigate whether repetitive exposure to rTNF can induce similar tolerance in tumor-bearing (TB) rats and ameliorate cachexia induced by the tumor. In experiment 1, non-tumor-bearing (NTB) and TB rats were randomized to either escalating low doses of rTNF or saline i.p. twice daily for 9 consecutive days. NTB rats treated with rTNF demonstrated a significant decline in food intake and weight change ( P < 0.00001) but soon developed tolerance to the cachectic effects of rTNF; they consumed significantly more food than on the first day of treatment and had weight change similar to NTB rats treated with saline. TB rats treated with rTNF showed a similar significant decline in food intake and weight change ( P < 0.0001) and also demonstrated similar tolerance to the cachectic effects of rTNF with continued treatment. Following treatment, TB rats that had been treated with rTNF ate significantly more and lost less weight than TB rats that had been treated with saline ( P < 0.00001). rTNF treatment of TB rats also demonstrated antineoplastic activity, as estimated tumor weight of tumors from rats treated with rTNF were significantly less than controls ( P = 0.003). The anticachexia and antineoplastic effects of rTNF resulted in prolonged survival of TB rats treated with rTNF compared to control TB rats ( P = 0.015). Experiment 2 utilized two different rTNF treatment regimens in TB rats: one group received 12 days of escalating doses of rTNF, and another group received 15 days of rTNF treatment. TB rats treated with rTNF again had a significantly greater food intake ( P < 0.00001) and delayed weight loss ( P = 0.0001) posttreatment that was further augmented by additional doses of rTNF. Antineoplastic activity of rTNF was less clear, and overall tumor growth curves were not affected by rTNF treatment. Survival of TB rats treated with rTNF was again significantly increased in a dose-dependent manner ( P = 0.006). Repeated administration of low doses of rTNF to TB rats induces mild reduction in tumor growth, tolerance to the cachectic effects of rTNF that results in tolerance to the cachectic effects of tumor, and prolongation of survival.

Abstract: PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize the latest clinical developments in pharmacological interventions for primary cachexia. RECENT FINDINGS New orexigenic interventions that interfere with the central regulation of food intake are expected to be derived from the group of melanocortin receptor antagonists and ghrelin-mimetic agents. Emerging are muscle agents, including ubiquitin-proteasome system inhibitors, antimyostatin drugs, dystrophin, and beta2-adrenergic agonists. Results from anabolic steroids and angiotensin-II inhibitors are awaited. Recent data support insulin tackling fat metabolism. Branched-chain amino acids, N-3 fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acid are nutritional supplements that show potential. Adenosine 5'-triphosphate expands to related compounds (including ubiquinone). No breakthrough has occurred with the use of anti-inflammatory agents. Moreover, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and thalidomide merit definitive studies. Presently modern anticytokine treatments lack proof of broad effectiveness. Some NF-kappaB inhibitors hold early promise. Melatonin requires placebo-controlled trials before recommendations on clinical use. Oxidative stress probably contributes to muscle wasting. L-Carnitine and other antioxidants appear promising. Anticancer treatments designed as anticachexia interventions remain scarce. SUMMARY A number of promising new agents are in development but are not yet regarded as standard of care. This void calls for well-designed, proof-of-concept studies followed by placebo-controlled, randomized trials.