TL;DR: Australian studies suggest that the evolution of large group size and marked reproductive skew is linked with the need to defend against enemies at the nest, rather than high levels of relatedness, female biased sex allocation or opportunities to rear siblings.
Abstract: Comparative studies provide one of the most powerful means of assessing the relative roles of selective agents underlying social evolution in insects. Because of the wide variation in social organisation, sex allocation and ecological traits within and between species of allodapine bees, this group provides a wealth of material for such comparative work. Recent studies on Australian allodapine bees are reviewed here and their consequences for understanding social evolution are discussed. Studies to date suggest the following trends: (i) benefits of group living appear to be linked to preventing brood failure rather than to increased brood rearing efficiency; (ii) female-biased sex allocation, when it occurs, is linked to benefits of group living and kinship among nestmates, and is probably mediated via local fitness enhancement; (iii) female-biased sex allocation patterns do not usually coincide with opportunities for sib-rearing and are therefore unlikely to facilitate eusociality; (iv) relatedness within colonies is usually high, but in some species females will nest with unrelated females if kin are not available; and (v) phylogenetic studies suggest that opportunities for sib-rearing, arising from brood development patterns and colony phenology, are plesiomorphic for the exoneurine group, but in at least one phylogenetically distal clade, Exoneura sensu stricto, the evolution of large group size and social complexity coincides with the loss or reduction of opportunities for sib-rearing. Assured fitness return models may be applicable to weakly social allodapine species, but do not predict patterns of eusociality. Instead, Australian studies suggest that the evolution of large group size and marked reproductive skew is linked with the need to defend against enemies at the nest, rather than high levels of relatedness, female biased sex allocation or opportunities to rear siblings.
TL;DR: The results suggest that mass provisioning in Halterapis is a derived feature and that social behavior is an ancestral trait for all allodapine lineages, and cast doubt on the previous hypotheses that progressive provisioning and castelike social behavior evolved among lineages leading to the extant allodAPine taxa.
Abstract: Allodapine bees have long been regarded as providing useful material for examining the origins of social behavior. Previous researchers have assumed that sociality arose within the Allodapini and have linked the evolution of sociality to a transition from mass provisioning to progressive provisioning of brood. Early phylogenetic studies of allodapines were based on morphological and life-history data, but critical aspects of these studies relied on small character sets, where the polarity and coding of characters is problematic. We used nucleotide sequence data from one nuclear and two mitochondrial gene fragments to examine phylogenetic structure among nine allodapine genera. Our data set comprised 1,506 nucleotide positions, of which 402 were parsimony informative. Maximum parsimony, log determinant, and maximum likelihood analyses produced highly similar phylogenetic topologies, and all analyses indicated that the tropical African genus Macrogalea was the sister group to all other allodapines. This finding conflicts with that of previous studies, in which CompsomelissaC Halterapis formed the most basal group. Changing the basal node of the Allodapini has major consequences for understanding evolution in this tribe. Our results cast doubt on the previous hypotheses that progressive provisioning and castelike social behavior evolved among lineages leading to the extant allodapine taxa. Instead, our results suggest that mass provisioning in Halterapis is a derived feature and that social behavior is an ancestral trait for all allodapine lineages. The forms of social behavior present in extant allodapines are likely to have resulted from a long evolutionary history, which may help explain the complexity of social traits found in many allodapine bees. (Allodapini; bees; phylogenetics; progressive rearing; social evolution.) Allodapine bees (family Apidae, tribe Allodapini) are most diverse and abundant in subsaharan Africa, but their distribution extends throughout the Old World tropical and austral regions, northward into temperate
TL;DR: Systematic and behavioral studies of allodapine bees have shown that there are striking variations in degree of resemblance between different stages, and this paper concerns such discordant evolution, not only of larval and adult external characters, but also of pupal and male genital characters, together with a kind of adaptive radiation, primarily of larv characters.
Abstract: Michener, C. D. (Departments of Entomology and of Systematics and Ecology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045) 1977. Discordant evolution and the classification of allodapine bees. Syst. Zool. 26:32-56.-The allodapine bees constitute a part of the tribe Ceratinini. The immature stages have evolved a variety of adaptations to life in a common burrow instead of each isolated in its separate cell. This is a unique environment for bee larvae. These adaptations, which result in greater morphological diversity among allodapine larvae than among all other bee larvae together, involve often nonhomologous structures and behavior which serve for supporting the young in the nest burrow and for manipulating larval food masses, as well as various structures which appear to be sensory in nature, and are presumably related to the frequent interactions among individuals. In contrast, most adult allodapines are monotonously similar; most of the exceptions are social parasites which live in the nests of related nonparasitic species. Larvae of the parasites closely resemble those of their nonparasitic relatives; in this case it is the adults which have diverged sharply, the various species or groups of parasites having independently entered an environment that is unusual for adult bees. They rarely or never visit flowers and in effect replace the egg laying female (queen) of the host with which they live. A cladogram was developed; then four mutually exclusive sets of variables (larval, pupal, external adult, and male genitalic) were superimposed on the cladogram. These sets included all of the known and readily codified variables, a total of 269, not merely the few useful in preparing the cladogram. Presumably because of the very different and independent environmental factors impinging upon these sets of variables, phenetic classifications based on them would be exceedingly different. Other sets of variables (biochemical, internal structure, etc.) may well convey equally different information about resemblances. A phenetic classification, based of necessity only on known sets of variables, is always likely to be altered when new sets become accessible. A cladistic hypothesis should be more stable. To base a classification on a cladogram alone, however, seems undesirable. In the allodapines it would result either in lumping very dissimilar forms or in placement of very similar forms in different taxa; these procedures are contrary to usefulness and convenience as well as to our biological knowledge other than the sequence of cladistic branching points. [Phylogenetic relationships; phenetic classification; discordant evolution; allodapine bees.] Systematic and behavioral studies of allodapine bees (Michener, 1962 to 1976 except 1970c; Michener and Scheiring, 1976) have shown that there are striking variations in degree of resemblance between different stages. Thus two species may be very different in larval characters but similar in adult characters while two other species may be similar in larval features but strikingly different in the adult stage. This means that rates of morphological change have been different for different stages-sometimes larvae have di' Contribution number 1598 from the Department of Entomology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, U.S.A. This is a product of National Science Foundation Grant GB-37301X. verged strongly while adults have not and sometimes the reverse has taken place. This paper concerns such discordant evolution, not only of larval and adult external characters, but also of pupal and male genital characters, together with a kind of adaptive radiation, primarily of larval characters. Allodapine bees are members of the tribe Ceratinini and are most richly developed in Africa, but found throughout the Old World tropical and austral regions, northward well into the temperate zone in Asia Minor and into the southern edge of that zone across the lowlands of Asia from India eastward. Like their non-allodapine relatives, the cosmopolitan Ceratina (in-
TL;DR: Maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood methods using molecular sequence data from two mitochondrial gene regions and a single nuclear gene region are used to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships of the Australian allodapine genera, suggesting that the exoneurine group (Brevineura, Exoneurella, and Exoneura+Inquilina) diverged very rapidly and are monophyletic to the exclusion of other (primarily African) allodic genera.