TL;DR: One hundred cases of mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterus were encountered in patients 14 to 89 years of age, who usually had the symptom of abnormal vaginal bleeding, and the only feature associated with an increased risk for recurrence was the presence of myometrial invasion.
TL;DR: Cancers were more commonly found in ovaries when endometriosis was present in that ovary compared to when it was present at other sites, and the association of endometiosis with endometRIoid and clear cell carcinoma was much stronger than that of serous and mucinous tumors.
Abstract: One thousand consecutive cases of surgically proven endometriosis were reviewed to evaluate the frequency and types of pelvic cancers that were associated with ovarian and extraovarian endometriosis. The frequency and types of histologic abnormalities present in the eutopic endometrium when cancers were noted in endometriosis were also evaluated. In the large subset of cases for which the authors were the primary pathologists and all foci of endometriosis were recorded, the frequency of malignancy was 10.8%. In contrast, the frequency was only 3.2% in cases diagnosed by others previously in our institution. Cancers were more commonly found in ovaries when endometriosis was present in that ovary (5%) compared to when endometriosis was present at other sites (1%). Clear cell and endometrioid carcinomas were the malignancies most commonly seen in ovaries containing endometriosis, while clear cell adenocarcinoma and adenosarcoma were most commonly seen in conjunction with extraovarian endometriosis. The association of endometriosis with endometrioid and clear cell carcinoma was much stronger than that of serous and mucinous tumors (p < .01). Concurrent endometrial pathology was commonly seen in cases of malignant transformation of endometriosis (32% of cases).
TL;DR: There are differences in survival between histological types of US, and tumor-free resection margins at primary surgery are the most important prognostic factor for survival, sarcoma surgery should be centralized.
Abstract: Background. The histopathological classification and staging system for uterine sarcoma (US) were revised in 2003 and 2009, respectively. However, there is currently no consensus on the significance of various prognostic factors. Therefore the available clinicopathological data on US are summarized in this review. Methods. Articles on uterine sarcoma published in English from 1970 to 2011 were identified systematically by computer-based searches in Medline and the Cochrane Library. Results. Prognosis of US is poor, with a five-year survival rate as low as 30%. The most common histological types are leiomyosarcoma (LMS, 63%), endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS, 21%), adenosarcoma (6%), undifferentiated sarcoma (5%) and other types (5%). Carcinosarcoma is a mixed tumor, which is today regarded as a subset of endometrial carcinoma. Disease stage is the most important prognostic factor for all types of US. However, the prognosis of stage I LMS is also significantly related to tumor size and mitotic inde...
TL;DR: Polypoid endometRIosis is a rare manifestation of endometriosis that may be mistaken for a neoplasm on clinical, intraoperative, or pathologic assessment and, like conventional endometiosis, some may evolve into a premalignant or, rarely, aNeoplastic lesion.
Abstract: We describe 24 cases of polypoid endometriosis, most of which were referred because of problems in differential diagnosis, particularly distinction from a low-grade mullerian neoplasm. The patients were 23 to 78 years (mean 52.5 years) of age. Seven patients were on unopposed estrogen, four on combined estrogen-progestin therapy, and one patient had a synchronous ovarian thecoma. The most common clinical presentations were a pelvic mass, vaginal polypoid masses, and large bowel obstruction. In some cases, the intraoperative findings suggested a neoplasm. Sites of involvement in order of frequency included colon, ovary, uterine serosa, cervical and/or vaginal mucosa, ureter, fallopian tube, omentum, bladder, paraurethral and paravaginal soft tissue, and retroperitoneum. Multiple sites were involved in seven cases. Five cases occurred within ovarian or extraovarian endometriotic cysts. The lesions ranged up to 14 cm in size and formed polypoid, pink, gray or tan, masses. On microscopic examination, the polypoid masses were composed of an admixture of endometriotic glands and stroma. A variety of glandular architectural patterns were observed, sometimes in combination, most commonly cystic and noncystic simple hyperplasia, but also simple or complex hyperplasia with atypia, disordered proliferative, and cystic atrophy. Various types of epithelial metaplasia (tubal, mucinous, squamous, papillary syncytial metaplasia) were common. Hemorrhage, fibrosis, prominent thick-walled blood vessels, hemosiderin-laden histiocytes, and decidual change were also present in some cases. Eighteen cases were associated with usual (nonpolypoid) endometriosis. In one case, polypoid endometriosis merged with a mucinous borderline tumor of endocervical-type. In all but two cases, polypoid endometriosis lacked periglandular stromal hypercellularity, stromal atypia, and intraglandular stromal papillae, helping distinguish it from adenosarcoma. Focal intraglandular stromal papillae were noted in two cases with focal mild periglandular stromal hypercellularity in one of them, but no stromal atypia was present in either case. Follow-up data in 17 patients indicated that 15 patients were alive without evidence of residual disease, 1 was alive with residual endometriosis, and 1 died of other causes. In conclusion, polypoid endometriosis is a rare manifestation of endometriosis that may be mistaken for a neoplasm on clinical, intraoperative, or pathologic assessment. Some cases may be attributable to exogenous hormones or hyperestrinism and, like conventional endometriosis, some may evolve into a premalignant or, rarely, a neoplastic lesion. The main lesion in the differential is a mullerian (mesodermal) adenosarcoma.
TL;DR: The most useful criterion for distinguishing adenofibroma from adenosarcoma was the frequency of mitotic figures found in the stroma, and the only morphologic feature that correlated with aggressive behavior of adenosarena was deep myometrial invasion.
Abstract: The clinical and histopathologic features of ten adenofibromas and 25 adenosarcomas of the uterus were studied. The most useful criterion for distinguishing adenofibroma from adenosarcoma was the frequency of mitotic figures found in the stroma. Adenofibromas had fewer than four mitotic figures per 100 HPF in the most active areas; adenosarcomas had four or more. Myometrial invasion, histologically malignant heterologous mesenchymal elements, and marked atypia of stromal cells were histologic features detected only in adenosarcoma. Of the women with adenosarcoma, ten (40%) had recurrences, with a median interval to recurrence of five years. The only morphologic feature that correlated with aggressive behavior of adenosarcoma was deep myometrial invasion. Adenofibroma and adenosarcoma are in the family of mixed mesodermal tumors, but are distinct clinical and pathologic entities.