Format your manuscript to the Weather and Climate Dynamics requirements — abstract, Copernicus author–year references, and required declarations — and submit through the Copernicus Office Editor submission system without a formatting rejection.
4.4
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 24 August, 2026
A strong study can still bounce at Weather and Climate Dynamics before review if the manuscript ignores the journal’s formatting requirements. This template is built around Weather and Climate Dynamics’s actual requirements — its abstract rules, Copernicus author–year references, and the required declarations — so your submission clears screening on the first pass. Everything below tracks the Weather and Climate Dynamics author guidelines; check it directly if anything looks out of date by the time you submit.
It’s a manuscript shell set up to Weather and Climate Dynamics’s specifications for weather and climate dynamics. Weather and Climate Dynamics is published by Copernicus Publications. The shell covers the title page, the abstract, a body in Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) order, and a reference list in Copernicus author–year style.
Start with the title page (authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs). The abstract is an unstructured abstract within the journal's limit. The body follows Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD), and the reference list uses Copernicus author–year. Close with the declarations block: ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability.
The details that trip up most first submissions: not preparing the manuscript for the interactive public-review stage, references not in the Copernicus author–year format, and missing code/data availability statements. Beyond that, match your article type’s specific limits rather than assuming the defaults apply, keep Copernicus author–year formatting consistent from the first draft, and submit only through the Copernicus Office Editor submission system — email submissions aren’t processed.
The shell mirrors what Weather and Climate Dynamics’s editorial staff check first: abstract format and length, Copernicus author–year reference formatting, and a complete declarations block. For the journal’s full aims and scope, see the Weather and Climate Dynamics journal home page. This is an open-access title with an interactive public-review stage; check the current article-processing charge before you submit. Manuscripts go in through the Copernicus Office Editor submission system, which also tracks your paper through peer review.
| Element | Weather and Climate Dynamics requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | an unstructured abstract within the journal's limit |
| Main text | Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) |
| Declarations | Ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability |
| Figures / tables | Captioned, cited in order; check format and resolution rules in the guide |
| Supplemental | Large datasets, extra tables, code — uploaded separately and cited in text |
| Submission | the Copernicus Office Editor submission system |
Read the Weather and Climate Dynamics author guidelines once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after your results are stable so it matches the paper. Set Copernicus author–year as your reference style before adding a single citation — retrofitting it later is where errors creep in.
Skim two or three recent Weather and Climate Dynamics papers to calibrate depth, structure, and figure style. State your contribution in the first two paragraphs, not on page ten. Write a data-availability statement that names a real repository rather than a placeholder, and disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in your cover letter. Confirm current open-access pricing and any institutional agreement before committing to a fee.
Do one focused pass against the Weather and Climate Dynamics author guidelines: scope fit, abstract format, length, Copernicus author–year references, required declarations, and figure quality. Re-check the items that most often cause a bounce here — not preparing the manuscript for the interactive public-review stage, references not in the Copernicus author–year format, and missing code/data availability statements. Then submit through the Copernicus Office Editor submission system.