Reviews in the Neurosciences Template
Format your manuscript to the Reviews in the Neurosciences requirements — abstract, numbered references, and required declarations — and submit through the journal's online submission system without a formatting rejection.
4.4
How to Use the Reviews in the Neurosciences Template | A Step-by-Step Guide
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 24 August, 2026
Most manuscripts sent to Reviews in the Neurosciences don’t stumble on the science — they stumble on formatting caught at the first editorial check. This template is built around Reviews in the Neurosciences’s actual requirements — its abstract rules, numbered references, and the required declarations — so your submission clears screening on the first pass. Everything below tracks the Reviews in the Neurosciences author guidelines; check it directly if anything looks out of date by the time you submit.
What is the Reviews in the Neurosciences Template?
It’s a manuscript shell set up to Reviews in the Neurosciences’s specifications for review-level advances across the neurosciences. Reviews in the Neurosciences is published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH. The shell covers the title page, the abstract, a body in Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) order, and a reference list in numbered style.
What’s actually in a standard Reviews in the Neurosciences submission:
Start with the title page (authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs). The abstract is an abstract within the journal's stated word limit. The body follows Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD), and the reference list uses numbered. Close with the declarations block: ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability.
What separates a clean submission from one that gets kicked back:
The details that trip up most first submissions: an abstract outside the stated word limit, references not in the journal's required format, and missing declarations (ethics, competing interests, funding). Beyond that, match your article type’s specific limits rather than assuming the defaults apply, keep numbered formatting consistent from the first draft, and submit only through the journal's online submission system — email submissions aren’t processed.
What does this Reviews in the Neurosciences Template include?
The shell mirrors what Reviews in the Neurosciences’s editorial staff check first: abstract format and length, numbered reference formatting, and a complete declarations block. For the journal’s full aims and scope, see the Reviews in the Neurosciences journal home page. Reviews in the Neurosciences offers an open-access option; check the current article-processing charge and any waiver before you commit. Manuscripts go in through the journal's online submission system, which also tracks your paper through peer review.
Steps to Use This Template with Scispace Agent
- Click Start Writing on this page — you land on the Scispace Agent prompt screen with the template already loaded.
- Use the loaded template as-is, or upload your own version if you have one.
- Edit the prompt with your actual details: topic, article type, and any word or figure limits specific to that type.
- Run it. The agent drafts directly into the correct structure — abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) body, figure placeholders, numbered references, and the full declarations block — with no manual reformatting afterward.
- Review the draft in View Outputs and regenerate any section that needs tightening.
- Export to Word or LaTeX once it’s ready for submission.
Reviews in the Neurosciences Template Structure at a Glance
| Element | Reviews in the Neurosciences requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | an abstract within the journal's stated word limit |
| Main text | Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) |
| Declarations | Ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability |
| Figures / tables | Captioned, cited in order; check format and resolution rules in the guide |
| Supplemental | Large datasets, extra tables, code — uploaded separately and cited in text |
| Submission | the journal's online submission system |
Quick Tips for Using the Reviews in the Neurosciences Template
Read the Reviews in the Neurosciences author guidelines once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after your results are stable so it matches the paper. Set numbered as your reference style before adding a single citation — retrofitting it later is where errors creep in.
Best Practices
Skim two or three recent Reviews in the Neurosciences papers to calibrate depth, structure, and figure style. State your contribution in the first two paragraphs, not on page ten. Write a data-availability statement that names a real repository rather than a placeholder, and disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in your cover letter. Confirm current open-access pricing and any institutional agreement before committing to a fee.
Before You Submit: Final Check
Do one focused pass against the Reviews in the Neurosciences author guidelines: scope fit, abstract format, length, numbered references, required declarations, and figure quality. Re-check the items that most often cause a bounce here — an abstract outside the stated word limit, references not in the journal's required format, and missing declarations (ethics, competing interests, funding). Then submit through the journal's online submission system.
