Format your manuscript to the Review of Economic Studies requirements — abstract, Vancouver (numbered) references, and required declarations — and submit through ScholarOne Manuscripts without a formatting rejection.
4.6
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 24 August, 2026
Getting past the desk at Review of Economic Studies is usually less about the research and more about matching the journal’s exact submission rules. This template is built around Review of Economic Studies’s actual requirements — its abstract rules, Vancouver (numbered) references, and the required declarations — so your submission clears screening on the first pass. Everything below tracks the Review of Economic Studies author guidelines; check it directly if anything looks out of date by the time you submit.
It’s a manuscript shell set up to Review of Economic Studies’s specifications for theoretical and applied economics. Review of Economic Studies is published by Oxford University Press. The shell covers the title page, the abstract, a body in Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) order, and a reference list in Vancouver (numbered) style.
Start with the title page (authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs). The abstract is an abstract within the journal's stated limit (structured or unstructured per the guidelines). The body follows Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD), and the reference list uses Vancouver (numbered). Close with the declarations block: ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability.
The details that trip up most first submissions: references not in the journal's specified format, an abstract outside the stated word limit, and missing conflict-of-interest and funding statements. Beyond that, match your article type’s specific limits rather than assuming the defaults apply, keep Vancouver (numbered) formatting consistent from the first draft, and submit only through ScholarOne Manuscripts — email submissions aren’t processed.
The shell mirrors what Review of Economic Studies’s editorial staff check first: abstract format and length, Vancouver (numbered) reference formatting, and a complete declarations block. For the journal’s full aims and scope, see the Review of Economic Studies journal home page. Review of Economic Studies offers an open-access option; check the current article-processing charge and any waiver before you commit. Manuscripts go in through ScholarOne Manuscripts, which also tracks your paper through peer review.
| Element | Review of Economic Studies requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | an abstract within the journal's stated limit (structured or unstructured per the guidelines) |
| Main text | Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) |
| Declarations | Ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability |
| Figures / tables | Captioned, cited in order; check format and resolution rules in the guide |
| Supplemental | Large datasets, extra tables, code — uploaded separately and cited in text |
| Submission | ScholarOne Manuscripts |
Read the Review of Economic Studies author guidelines once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after your results are stable so it matches the paper. Set Vancouver (numbered) as your reference style before adding a single citation — retrofitting it later is where errors creep in.
Skim two or three recent Review of Economic Studies papers to calibrate depth, structure, and figure style. State your contribution in the first two paragraphs, not on page ten. Write a data-availability statement that names a real repository rather than a placeholder, and disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in your cover letter. Confirm current open-access pricing and any institutional agreement before committing to a fee.
Do one focused pass against the Review of Economic Studies author guidelines: scope fit, abstract format, length, Vancouver (numbered) references, required declarations, and figure quality. Re-check the items that most often cause a bounce here — references not in the journal's specified format, an abstract outside the stated word limit, and missing conflict-of-interest and funding statements. Then submit through ScholarOne Manuscripts.