Format your manuscript to the Respiratory Research requirements — abstract, Vancouver (numbered) references, and required declarations — and submit through the journal's online submission system without a formatting rejection.
4.7
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 24 August, 2026
Getting past the desk at Respiratory Research is usually less about the research and more about matching the journal’s exact submission rules. This template is built around Respiratory Research’s actual requirements — its abstract rules, Vancouver (numbered) references, and the required declarations — so your submission clears screening on the first pass. Everything below tracks the Respiratory Research author guidelines; check it directly if anything looks out of date by the time you submit.
It’s a manuscript shell set up to Respiratory Research’s specifications for basic, translational, and clinical respiratory research. Respiratory Research is published by BMC (Springer Nature). The shell covers the title page, the abstract, a body in Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) order, and a reference list in Vancouver (numbered) style.
Start with the title page (authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs). The abstract is a structured abstract (Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions) where the article type requires it. The body follows Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD), and the reference list uses Vancouver (numbered). Close with the declarations block: ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability.
The details that trip up most first submissions: a structured abstract missing required headings, no data availability statement, and not budgeting for the open-access APC. Beyond that, match your article type’s specific limits rather than assuming the defaults apply, keep Vancouver (numbered) formatting consistent from the first draft, and submit only through the journal's online submission system — email submissions aren’t processed.
The shell mirrors what Respiratory Research’s editorial staff check first: abstract format and length, Vancouver (numbered) reference formatting, and a complete declarations block. For the journal’s full aims and scope, see the Respiratory Research journal home page. This is an open-access title, so plan for the article-processing charge (check the current APC and any waiver before you submit). Manuscripts go in through the journal's online submission system, which also tracks your paper through peer review.
| Element | Respiratory Research requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | a structured abstract (Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions) where the article type requires it |
| Main text | Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) |
| Declarations | Ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability |
| Figures / tables | Captioned, cited in order; check format and resolution rules in the guide |
| Supplemental | Large datasets, extra tables, code — uploaded separately and cited in text |
| Submission | the journal's online submission system |
Read the Respiratory Research author guidelines once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after your results are stable so it matches the paper. Set Vancouver (numbered) as your reference style before adding a single citation — retrofitting it later is where errors creep in.
Skim two or three recent Respiratory Research papers to calibrate depth, structure, and figure style. State your contribution in the first two paragraphs, not on page ten. Write a data-availability statement that names a real repository rather than a placeholder, and disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in your cover letter. Confirm current open-access pricing and any institutional agreement before committing to a fee.
Do one focused pass against the Respiratory Research author guidelines: scope fit, abstract format, length, Vancouver (numbered) references, required declarations, and figure quality. Re-check the items that most often cause a bounce here — a structured abstract missing required headings, no data availability statement, and not budgeting for the open-access APC. Then submit through the journal's online submission system.