Format your manuscript to the Reading Research Quarterly requirements — abstract, Vancouver (numbered) references, and required declarations — and submit through Research Exchange (Wiley's submission system) without a formatting rejection.
4.8
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 24 August, 2026
Most manuscripts sent to Reading Research Quarterly don’t stumble on the science — they stumble on formatting caught at the first editorial check. This template is built around Reading Research Quarterly’s actual requirements — its abstract rules, Vancouver (numbered) references, and the required declarations — so your submission clears screening on the first pass. Everything below tracks the Reading Research Quarterly author guidelines; check it directly if anything looks out of date by the time you submit.
It’s a manuscript shell set up to Reading Research Quarterly’s specifications for reading, literacy, and literacy education across the lifespan. Reading Research Quarterly is published by Wiley. The shell covers the title page, the abstract, a body in Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) order, and a reference list in Vancouver (numbered) style.
Start with the title page (authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs). The abstract is an abstract of about 200–250 words (structured or unstructured per the journal's guidelines). The body follows Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD), and the reference list uses Vancouver (numbered). Close with the declarations block: ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability.
The details that trip up most first submissions: no ORCID registered for the corresponding author, reference formatting inconsistent with the guidelines, and a missing data availability statement. Beyond that, match your article type’s specific limits rather than assuming the defaults apply, keep Vancouver (numbered) formatting consistent from the first draft, and submit only through Research Exchange (Wiley's submission system) — email submissions aren’t processed.
The shell mirrors what Reading Research Quarterly’s editorial staff check first: abstract format and length, Vancouver (numbered) reference formatting, and a complete declarations block. For the journal’s full aims and scope, see the Reading Research Quarterly journal home page. Reading Research Quarterly offers an open-access option; check the current article-processing charge and any waiver before you commit. Manuscripts go in through Research Exchange (Wiley's submission system), which also tracks your paper through peer review.
| Element | Reading Research Quarterly requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | an abstract of about 200–250 words (structured or unstructured per the journal's guidelines) |
| Main text | Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) |
| Declarations | Ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability |
| Figures / tables | Captioned, cited in order; check format and resolution rules in the guide |
| Supplemental | Large datasets, extra tables, code — uploaded separately and cited in text |
| Submission | Research Exchange (Wiley's submission system) |
Read the Reading Research Quarterly author guidelines once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after your results are stable so it matches the paper. Set Vancouver (numbered) as your reference style before adding a single citation — retrofitting it later is where errors creep in.
Skim two or three recent Reading Research Quarterly papers to calibrate depth, structure, and figure style. State your contribution in the first two paragraphs, not on page ten. Write a data-availability statement that names a real repository rather than a placeholder, and disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in your cover letter. Confirm current open-access pricing and any institutional agreement before committing to a fee.
Do one focused pass against the Reading Research Quarterly author guidelines: scope fit, abstract format, length, Vancouver (numbered) references, required declarations, and figure quality. Re-check the items that most often cause a bounce here — no ORCID registered for the corresponding author, reference formatting inconsistent with the guidelines, and a missing data availability statement. Then submit through Research Exchange (Wiley's submission system).