Format your manuscript to the Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging requirements — abstract, numbered references, and required declarations — and submit through the RSNA submission system (ScholarOne) without a formatting rejection.
4.5
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 19 August, 2026
A strong study can still bounce at Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging before review if the manuscript ignores the journal’s formatting requirements. This template is built around Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging’s actual requirements — its abstract rules, numbered references, and the required declarations — so your submission clears screening on the first pass. Everything below tracks the Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging author guidelines; check it directly if anything looks out of date by the time you submit.
It’s a manuscript shell set up to Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging’s specifications for cardiothoracic imaging. Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging is published by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). The shell covers the title page, the abstract, a body in Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) order, and a reference list in numbered style.
Start with the title page (authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs). The abstract is a structured abstract per the journal's requirements. The body follows Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD), and the reference list uses numbered. Close with the declarations block: ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability.
The details that trip up most first submissions: an abstract outside the stated word limit, references not in the journal's required format, and missing declarations (ethics, competing interests, funding). Beyond that, match your article type’s specific limits rather than assuming the defaults apply, keep numbered formatting consistent from the first draft, and submit only through the RSNA submission system (ScholarOne) — email submissions aren’t processed.
The shell mirrors what Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging’s editorial staff check first: abstract format and length, numbered reference formatting, and a complete declarations block. For the journal’s full aims and scope, see the Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging journal home page. Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging offers an open-access option; check the current article-processing charge and any waiver before you commit. Manuscripts go in through the RSNA submission system (ScholarOne), which also tracks your paper through peer review.
| Element | Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | a structured abstract per the journal's requirements |
| Main text | Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) |
| Declarations | Ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability |
| Figures / tables | Captioned, cited in order; check format and resolution rules in the guide |
| Supplemental | Large datasets, extra tables, code — uploaded separately and cited in text |
| Submission | the RSNA submission system (ScholarOne) |
Read the Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging author guidelines once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after your results are stable so it matches the paper. Set numbered as your reference style before adding a single citation — retrofitting it later is where errors creep in.
Skim two or three recent Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging papers to calibrate depth, structure, and figure style. State your contribution in the first two paragraphs, not on page ten. Write a data-availability statement that names a real repository rather than a placeholder, and disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in your cover letter. Confirm current open-access pricing and any institutional agreement before committing to a fee.
Do one focused pass against the Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging author guidelines: scope fit, abstract format, length, numbered references, required declarations, and figure quality. Re-check the items that most often cause a bounce here — an abstract outside the stated word limit, references not in the journal's required format, and missing declarations (ethics, competing interests, funding). Then submit through the RSNA submission system (ScholarOne).