Format your manuscript to the Public Health Reviews requirements — abstract, Frontiers references, and required declarations — and submit through the Frontiers submission system without a formatting rejection.
4.4
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 19 August, 2026
Getting past the desk at Public Health Reviews is usually less about the research and more about matching the journal’s exact submission rules. This template is built around Public Health Reviews’s actual requirements — its abstract rules, Frontiers references, and the required declarations — so your submission clears screening on the first pass. Everything below tracks the Public Health Reviews author guidelines; check it directly if anything looks out of date by the time you submit.
It’s a manuscript shell set up to Public Health Reviews’s specifications for reviews across public health. Public Health Reviews is published by Frontiers. The shell covers the title page, the abstract, a body in a review structure (Introduction, themed thematic sections, and a Conclusions/Outlook) order, and a reference list in Frontiers style.
Start with the title page (authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs). The abstract is an abstract of ≤350 words with no citations. The body follows a review structure (Introduction, themed thematic sections, and a Conclusions/Outlook), and the reference list uses Frontiers. Close with the declarations block: ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability.
The details that trip up most first submissions: citations placed in the abstract (not allowed), references not in the Frontiers format, and not budgeting for the publishing fee. Beyond that, match your article type’s specific limits rather than assuming the defaults apply, keep Frontiers formatting consistent from the first draft, and submit only through the Frontiers submission system — email submissions aren’t processed.
The shell mirrors what Public Health Reviews’s editorial staff check first: abstract format and length, Frontiers reference formatting, and a complete declarations block. For the journal’s full aims and scope, see the Public Health Reviews journal home page. This is an open-access title, so check the current publishing fee and any waiver before you submit. Manuscripts go in through the Frontiers submission system, which also tracks your paper through peer review.
| Element | Public Health Reviews requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | an abstract of ≤350 words with no citations |
| Main text | a review structure (Introduction, themed thematic sections, and a Conclusions/Outlook) |
| Declarations | Ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability |
| Figures / tables | Captioned, cited in order; check format and resolution rules in the guide |
| Supplemental | Large datasets, extra tables, code — uploaded separately and cited in text |
| Submission | the Frontiers submission system |
Read the Public Health Reviews author guidelines once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after your results are stable so it matches the paper. Set Frontiers as your reference style before adding a single citation — retrofitting it later is where errors creep in.
Skim two or three recent Public Health Reviews papers to calibrate depth, structure, and figure style. State your contribution in the first two paragraphs, not on page ten. Write a data-availability statement that names a real repository rather than a placeholder, and disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in your cover letter. Confirm current open-access pricing and any institutional agreement before committing to a fee.
Do one focused pass against the Public Health Reviews author guidelines: scope fit, abstract format, length, Frontiers references, required declarations, and figure quality. Re-check the items that most often cause a bounce here — citations placed in the abstract (not allowed), references not in the Frontiers format, and not budgeting for the publishing fee. Then submit through the Frontiers submission system.