Format your manuscript to the Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics requirements — abstract, numbered references, and required declarations — and submit through ScholarOne Manuscripts without a formatting rejection.
4.5
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 19 August, 2026
Getting past the desk at Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics is usually less about the research and more about matching the journal’s exact submission rules. This template is built around Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh A’s actual requirements — its abstract rules, numbered references, and the required declarations — so your submission clears screening on the first pass. Everything below tracks the Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh A author guidelines; check it directly if anything looks out of date by the time you submit.
It’s a manuscript shell set up to Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh A’s specifications for pure and applied mathematics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics is published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. The shell covers the title page, the abstract, a body in Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) order, and a reference list in numbered style.
Start with the title page (authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs). The abstract is an abstract within the journal's stated limit (commonly ≤250 words). Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh A also expects a manuscript prepared in LaTeX. The body follows Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD), and the reference list uses numbered. Close with the declarations block: ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability.
The details that trip up most first submissions: an abstract outside the stated word limit, references not in the journal's format, and missing competing-interests and funding declarations. Beyond that, match your article type’s specific limits rather than assuming the defaults apply, keep numbered formatting consistent from the first draft, and submit only through ScholarOne Manuscripts — email submissions aren’t processed.
The shell mirrors what Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh A’s editorial staff check first: abstract format and length, numbered reference formatting, and a complete declarations block. For the journal’s full aims and scope, see the Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh A journal home page. Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh A offers an open-access option; check the current article-processing charge and any waiver before you commit. Manuscripts go in through ScholarOne Manuscripts, which also tracks your paper through peer review.
| Element | Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh A requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | an abstract within the journal's stated limit (commonly ≤250 words) |
| Main text | Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) |
| Declarations | Ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability |
| Figures / tables | Captioned, cited in order; check format and resolution rules in the guide |
| Supplemental | Large datasets, extra tables, code — uploaded separately and cited in text |
| Submission | ScholarOne Manuscripts |
Read the Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh A author guidelines once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after your results are stable so it matches the paper. Set numbered as your reference style before adding a single citation — retrofitting it later is where errors creep in. Prepare a manuscript prepared in LaTeX early rather than leaving it to the end.
Skim two or three recent Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh A papers to calibrate depth, structure, and figure style. State your contribution in the first two paragraphs, not on page ten. Write a data-availability statement that names a real repository rather than a placeholder, and disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in your cover letter. Confirm current open-access pricing and any institutional agreement before committing to a fee.
Do one focused pass against the Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh A author guidelines: scope fit, abstract format, length, numbered references, required declarations, and figure quality. Re-check the items that most often cause a bounce here — an abstract outside the stated word limit, references not in the journal's format, and missing competing-interests and funding declarations. Then submit through ScholarOne Manuscripts.