Format your manuscript to the Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences requirements — abstract, Royal Society (Vancouver) references, and required declarations — and submit through the Royal Society submission site (ScholarOne) without a formatting rejection.
4.4
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 19 August, 2026
Getting past the desk at Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences is usually less about the research and more about matching the journal’s exact submission rules. This template is built around Proc. R. Soc. B’s actual requirements — its abstract rules, Royal Society (Vancouver) references, and the required declarations — so your submission clears screening on the first pass. Everything below tracks the Proc. R. Soc. B author guidelines; check it directly if anything looks out of date by the time you submit.
It’s a manuscript shell set up to Proc. R. Soc. B’s specifications for the biological sciences. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences is published by the Royal Society. The shell covers the title page, the abstract, a body in Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) order, and a reference list in Royal Society (Vancouver) style.
Start with the title page (authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs). The abstract is an unstructured abstract within the journal's limit. The body follows Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD), and the reference list uses Royal Society (Vancouver). Close with the declarations block: ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability.
The details that trip up most first submissions: references not in the Royal Society format, an abstract over the stated limit, and missing data-accessibility and ethics statements. Beyond that, match your article type’s specific limits rather than assuming the defaults apply, keep Royal Society (Vancouver) formatting consistent from the first draft, and submit only through the Royal Society submission site (ScholarOne) — email submissions aren’t processed.
The shell mirrors what Proc. R. Soc. B’s editorial staff check first: abstract format and length, Royal Society (Vancouver) reference formatting, and a complete declarations block. For the journal’s full aims and scope, see the Proc. R. Soc. B journal home page. Proc. R. Soc. B offers an open-access option; check the current article-processing charge and any waiver before you commit. Manuscripts go in through the Royal Society submission site (ScholarOne), which also tracks your paper through peer review.
| Element | Proc. R. Soc. B requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | an unstructured abstract within the journal's limit |
| Main text | Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) |
| Declarations | Ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability |
| Figures / tables | Captioned, cited in order; check format and resolution rules in the guide |
| Supplemental | Large datasets, extra tables, code — uploaded separately and cited in text |
| Submission | the Royal Society submission site (ScholarOne) |
Read the Proc. R. Soc. B author guidelines once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after your results are stable so it matches the paper. Set Royal Society (Vancouver) as your reference style before adding a single citation — retrofitting it later is where errors creep in.
Skim two or three recent Proc. R. Soc. B papers to calibrate depth, structure, and figure style. State your contribution in the first two paragraphs, not on page ten. Write a data-availability statement that names a real repository rather than a placeholder, and disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in your cover letter. Confirm current open-access pricing and any institutional agreement before committing to a fee.
Do one focused pass against the Proc. R. Soc. B author guidelines: scope fit, abstract format, length, Royal Society (Vancouver) references, required declarations, and figure quality. Re-check the items that most often cause a bounce here — references not in the Royal Society format, an abstract over the stated limit, and missing data-accessibility and ethics statements. Then submit through the Royal Society submission site (ScholarOne).