Format your manuscript to the Philosophy Compass requirements — abstract, author–year references, and required declarations — and submit through Research Exchange (Wiley's submission system) without a formatting rejection.
4.7
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 19 August, 2026
A strong study can still bounce at Philosophy Compass before review if the manuscript ignores the journal’s formatting requirements. This template is built around Philosophy Compass’s actual requirements — its abstract rules, author–year references, and the required declarations — so your submission clears screening on the first pass. Everything below tracks the Philosophy Compass author guidelines; check it directly if anything looks out of date by the time you submit.
It’s a manuscript shell set up to Philosophy Compass’s specifications for survey and state-of-the-field articles across philosophy. Compass is published by Wiley. The shell covers the title page, the abstract, a body in a review structure (Introduction, themed thematic sections, and a Conclusions/Outlook) order, and a reference list in author–year style.
Start with the title page (authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs). The abstract is an abstract of about 200–250 words (structured or unstructured per the journal's guidelines). The body follows a review structure (Introduction, themed thematic sections, and a Conclusions/Outlook), and the reference list uses author–year. Close with the declarations block: ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability.
The details that trip up most first submissions: no ORCID registered for the corresponding author, reference formatting inconsistent with the guidelines, and a missing data availability statement. Beyond that, match your article type’s specific limits rather than assuming the defaults apply, keep author–year formatting consistent from the first draft, and submit only through Research Exchange (Wiley's submission system) — email submissions aren’t processed.
The shell mirrors what Philosophy Compass’s editorial staff check first: abstract format and length, author–year reference formatting, and a complete declarations block. For the journal’s full aims and scope, see the Philosophy Compass journal home page. Philosophy Compass is available open access; check the current options before you submit. Manuscripts go in through Research Exchange (Wiley's submission system), which also tracks your paper through peer review.
| Element | Philosophy Compass requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | an abstract of about 200–250 words (structured or unstructured per the journal's guidelines) |
| Main text | a review structure (Introduction, themed thematic sections, and a Conclusions/Outlook) |
| Declarations | Ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability |
| Figures / tables | Captioned, cited in order; check format and resolution rules in the guide |
| Supplemental | Large datasets, extra tables, code — uploaded separately and cited in text |
| Submission | Research Exchange (Wiley's submission system) |
Read the Philosophy Compass author guidelines once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after your results are stable so it matches the paper. Set author–year as your reference style before adding a single citation — retrofitting it later is where errors creep in.
Skim two or three recent Philosophy Compass papers to calibrate depth, structure, and figure style. State your contribution in the first two paragraphs, not on page ten. Write a data-availability statement that names a real repository rather than a placeholder, and disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in your cover letter. Confirm current open-access pricing and any institutional agreement before committing to a fee.
Do one focused pass against the Philosophy Compass author guidelines: scope fit, abstract format, length, author–year references, required declarations, and figure quality. Re-check the items that most often cause a bounce here — no ORCID registered for the corresponding author, reference formatting inconsistent with the guidelines, and a missing data availability statement. Then submit through Research Exchange (Wiley's submission system).