Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Template
Format your manuscript to the Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation requirements — abstract, author–year references, and required declarations — and submit through Editorial Manager without a formatting rejection.
4.5
How to Use the Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Template | A Step-by-Step Guide
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 19 August, 2026
A strong study can still bounce at Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation before review if the manuscript ignores the journal’s formatting requirements. This template is built around PECON’s actual requirements — its abstract rules, author–year references, and the required declarations — so your submission clears screening on the first pass. Everything below tracks the PECON Guide for Authors; check it directly if anything looks out of date by the time you submit.
What is the Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Template?
It’s a manuscript shell set up to PECON’s specifications for ecology and conservation science. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation is published by Elsevier. The shell covers the title page, the abstract, a body in Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) order, and a reference list in author–year style.
What’s actually in a standard PECON submission:
Start with the title page (authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs). The abstract is a single unstructured paragraph, generally ≤250 words, with no references or non-standard abbreviations. PECON also expects Highlights (3–5 bullets, 85 characters max each). The body follows Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD), and the reference list uses author–year. Close with the declarations block: ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability.
What separates a clean submission from one that gets kicked back:
The details that trip up most first submissions: missing or over-length Highlights, no Declaration of Competing Interest statement, and a reference list that isn't consistent within the manuscript. Beyond that, match your article type’s specific limits rather than assuming the defaults apply, keep author–year formatting consistent from the first draft, and submit only through Editorial Manager — email submissions aren’t processed.
What does this Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Template include?
The shell mirrors what PECON’s editorial staff check first: abstract format and length, author–year reference formatting, and a complete declarations block. For the journal’s full aims and scope, see the PECON journal home page. PECON is open access; check the current article-processing charge before you submit. Manuscripts go in through Editorial Manager, which also tracks your paper through peer review.
Steps to Use This Template with Scispace Agent
- Click Start Writing on this page — you land on the Scispace Agent prompt screen with the template already loaded.
- Use the loaded template as-is, or upload your own version if you have one.
- Edit the prompt with your actual details: topic, article type, and any word or figure limits specific to that type.
- Run it. The agent drafts directly into the correct structure — abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) body, figure placeholders, author–year references, and the full declarations block — with no manual reformatting afterward.
- Review the draft in View Outputs and regenerate any section that needs tightening.
- Export to Word or LaTeX once it’s ready for submission.
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Template Structure at a Glance
| Element | PECON requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | a single unstructured paragraph, generally ≤250 words, with no references or non-standard abbreviations |
| Main text | Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) |
| Declarations | Ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability |
| Figures / tables | Captioned, cited in order; check format and resolution rules in the guide |
| Supplemental | Large datasets, extra tables, code — uploaded separately and cited in text |
| Submission | Editorial Manager |
Quick Tips for Using the PECON Template
Read the PECON Guide for Authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after your results are stable so it matches the paper. Set author–year as your reference style before adding a single citation — retrofitting it later is where errors creep in. Prepare Highlights (3–5 bullets, 85 characters max each) early rather than leaving it to the end.
Best Practices
Skim two or three recent PECON papers to calibrate depth, structure, and figure style. State your contribution in the first two paragraphs, not on page ten. Write a data-availability statement that names a real repository rather than a placeholder, and disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in your cover letter. Confirm current open-access pricing and any institutional agreement before committing to a fee.
Before You Submit: Final Check
Do one focused pass against the PECON Guide for Authors: scope fit, abstract format, length, author–year references, required declarations, and figure quality. Re-check the items that most often cause a bounce here — missing or over-length Highlights, no Declaration of Competing Interest statement, and a reference list that isn't consistent within the manuscript. Then submit through Editorial Manager.
