Format your manuscript to the Nature Reviews Chemistry requirements — abstract, Nature superscript-numbered references, and required declarations — and submit through the Nature online submission system without a formatting rejection.
4.3
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 19 August, 2026
Getting past the desk at Nature Reviews Chemistry is usually less about the research and more about matching the journal’s exact submission rules. This template is built around Nature Reviews Chemistry’s actual requirements — its abstract rules, Nature superscript-numbered references, and the required declarations — so your submission clears screening on the first pass. Everything below tracks the Nature Reviews Chemistry author guidelines; check it directly if anything looks out of date by the time you submit.
It’s a manuscript shell set up to Nature Reviews Chemistry’s specifications for the chemical sciences. Nature Reviews Chemistry is published by Springer Nature Portfolio). The shell covers the title page, the abstract, a body in a review structure (Introduction, themed thematic sections, and a Conclusions/Outlook) order, and a reference list in Nature superscript-numbered style.
Start with the title page (authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs). The abstract is a short unstructured summary of about 150 words aimed at a broad audience. The body follows a review structure (Introduction, themed thematic sections, and a Conclusions/Outlook), and the reference list uses Nature superscript-numbered. Close with the declarations block: ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability.
The details that trip up most first submissions: proposing a Review without first discussing scope with the editors, sections that read as a primary report rather than a synthesis, and display items that exceed the format specs. Beyond that, match your article type’s specific limits rather than assuming the defaults apply, keep Nature superscript-numbered formatting consistent from the first draft, and submit only through the Nature online submission system — email submissions aren’t processed.
The shell mirrors what Nature Reviews Chemistry’s editorial staff check first: abstract format and length, Nature superscript-numbered reference formatting, and a complete declarations block. For the journal’s full aims and scope, see the Nature Reviews Chemistry journal home page. Nature Reviews Chemistry offers an open-access option; check the current article-processing charge and any waiver before you commit. Manuscripts go in through the Nature online submission system, which also tracks your paper through peer review.
| Element | Nature Reviews Chemistry requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | a short unstructured summary of about 150 words aimed at a broad audience |
| Main text | a review structure (Introduction, themed thematic sections, and a Conclusions/Outlook) |
| Declarations | Ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability |
| Figures / tables | Captioned, cited in order; check format and resolution rules in the guide |
| Supplemental | Large datasets, extra tables, code — uploaded separately and cited in text |
| Submission | the Nature online submission system |
Read the Nature Reviews Chemistry author guidelines once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after your results are stable so it matches the paper. Set Nature superscript-numbered as your reference style before adding a single citation — retrofitting it later is where errors creep in.
Skim two or three recent Nature Reviews Chemistry papers to calibrate depth, structure, and figure style. State your contribution in the first two paragraphs, not on page ten. Write a data-availability statement that names a real repository rather than a placeholder, and disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in your cover letter. Confirm current open-access pricing and any institutional agreement before committing to a fee.
Do one focused pass against the Nature Reviews Chemistry author guidelines: scope fit, abstract format, length, Nature superscript-numbered references, required declarations, and figure quality. Re-check the items that most often cause a bounce here — proposing a Review without first discussing scope with the editors, sections that read as a primary report rather than a synthesis, and display items that exceed the format specs. Then submit through the Nature online submission system.