Format your manuscript to the Nano Letters requirements — abstract, ACS references, and required declarations — and submit through ACS Paragon Plus without a formatting rejection.
4.5
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 19 August, 2026
Most manuscripts sent to Nano Letters don’t stumble on the science — they stumble on formatting caught at the first editorial check. This template is built around Nano Letters’s actual requirements — its abstract rules, ACS references, and the required declarations — so your submission clears screening on the first pass. Everything below tracks the Nano Letters author guidelines; check it directly if anything looks out of date by the time you submit.
It’s a manuscript shell set up to Nano Letters’s specifications for nanoscience and nanotechnology, from synthesis to devices. Nano Letters is published by the American Chemical Society (ACS). The shell covers the title page, the abstract, a body in Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) order, and a reference list in ACS style.
Start with the title page (authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs). The abstract is an abstract within the journal's limit plus a graphical (TOC) abstract. The body follows Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD), and the reference list uses ACS. Close with the declarations block: ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability.
The details that trip up most first submissions: no TOC/graphical abstract where required, references not in ACS format, and SI not prepared as a separate file. Beyond that, match your article type’s specific limits rather than assuming the defaults apply, keep ACS formatting consistent from the first draft, and submit only through ACS Paragon Plus — email submissions aren’t processed.
The shell mirrors what Nano Letters’s editorial staff check first: abstract format and length, ACS reference formatting, and a complete declarations block. For the journal’s full aims and scope, see the Nano Letters journal home page. Nano Letters offers an open-access option; check the current article-processing charge and any waiver before you commit. Manuscripts go in through ACS Paragon Plus, which also tracks your paper through peer review.
| Element | Nano Letters requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | an abstract within the journal's limit plus a graphical (TOC) abstract |
| Main text | Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) |
| Declarations | Ethics approval, conflict of interest, funding, and data availability |
| Figures / tables | Captioned, cited in order; check format and resolution rules in the guide |
| Supplemental | Large datasets, extra tables, code — uploaded separately and cited in text |
| Submission | ACS Paragon Plus |
Read the Nano Letters author guidelines once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after your results are stable so it matches the paper. Set ACS as your reference style before adding a single citation — retrofitting it later is where errors creep in.
Skim two or three recent Nano Letters papers to calibrate depth, structure, and figure style. State your contribution in the first two paragraphs, not on page ten. Write a data-availability statement that names a real repository rather than a placeholder, and disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in your cover letter. Confirm current open-access pricing and any institutional agreement before committing to a fee.
Do one focused pass against the Nano Letters author guidelines: scope fit, abstract format, length, ACS references, required declarations, and figure quality. Re-check the items that most often cause a bounce here — no TOC/graphical abstract where required, references not in ACS format, and SI not prepared as a separate file. Then submit through ACS Paragon Plus.