Format your manuscript to the Mineralogical Magazine requirements — abstract, a Harvard author-date style (confirm in the instructions for contributors) references, and required declarations — and submit through ScholarOne Manuscripts without a formatting rejection.
4.8
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 19 August, 2026
Most manuscripts sent to Mineralogical Magazine don’t stumble on the science — they stumble on formatting caught at the first editorial check. This template is built around Mineral Mag’s actual requirements — its abstract rules, a Harvard author-date style (confirm in the instructions for contributors) references, and the required declarations — so your submission clears screening on the first pass. Everything below tracks the Mineral Mag author guidelines; check it directly if anything looks out of date by the time you submit.
It’s a manuscript shell set up to Mineral Mag’s specifications for mineralogy, crystallography, and geochemistry. Mineralogical Magazine is published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland. The shell covers the title page, the abstract, a body in Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) order, and a reference list in a Harvard author-date style (confirm in the instructions for contributors) style.
Start with the title page (authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs). The abstract is an abstract of ≤250 words. The body follows Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD), and the reference list uses a Harvard author-date style (confirm in the instructions for contributors). Close with the declarations block: conflict of interest, funding, and data availability.
Beyond that, match your article type’s specific limits rather than assuming the defaults apply, keep a Harvard author-date style (confirm in the instructions for contributors) formatting consistent from the first draft, and submit only through ScholarOne Manuscripts — email submissions aren’t processed.
The shell mirrors what Mineral Mag’s editorial staff check first: abstract format and length, a Harvard author-date style (confirm in the instructions for contributors) reference formatting, and a complete declarations block. For the journal’s full aims and scope, see the Mineral Mag journal home page. Mineral Mag offers an open-access option; check the current article-processing charge and any waiver before you commit. Manuscripts go in through ScholarOne Manuscripts, which also tracks your paper through peer review.
| Element | Mineral Mag requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | an abstract of ≤250 words |
| Main text | Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) |
| Declarations | Conflict of interest, funding, and data availability |
| Figures / tables | Captioned, cited in order; check format and resolution rules in the guide |
| Supplemental | Large datasets, extra tables, code — uploaded separately and cited in text |
| Submission | ScholarOne Manuscripts |
Read the Mineral Mag author guidelines once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after your results are stable so it matches the paper. Set a Harvard author-date style (confirm in the instructions for contributors) as your reference style before adding a single citation — retrofitting it later is where errors creep in.
Skim two or three recent Mineral Mag papers to calibrate depth, structure, and figure style. State your contribution in the first two paragraphs, not on page ten. Write a data-availability statement that names a real repository rather than a placeholder, and disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in your cover letter. Confirm current open-access pricing and any institutional agreement before committing to a fee.
Do one focused pass against the Mineral Mag author guidelines: scope fit, abstract format, length, a Harvard author-date style (confirm in the instructions for contributors) references, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through ScholarOne Manuscripts.