Format your manuscript to the Mind requirements — abstract, a Chicago-style notes system (confirm in the instructions for authors) references, and required declarations — and submit through ScholarOne Manuscripts without a formatting rejection.
4.4
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 19 August, 2026
Getting past the desk at Mind is usually less about the research and more about matching the journal’s exact submission rules. This template is built around Mind’s actual requirements — its abstract rules, a Chicago-style notes system (confirm in the instructions for authors) references, and the required declarations — so your submission clears screening on the first pass. Everything below tracks the Mind author guidelines; check it directly if anything looks out of date by the time you submit.
It’s a manuscript shell set up to Mind’s specifications for philosophy — logic, metaphysics, epistemology, mind, and language. Mind is published by Oxford University Press. The shell covers the title page, the abstract, a body in an introduction, the argument, objections and replies, and a conclusion order, and a reference list in a Chicago-style notes system (confirm in the instructions for authors) style.
Start with the title page (authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs). The abstract is a short abstract stating the thesis and argument. The body follows an introduction, the argument, objections and replies, and a conclusion, and the reference list uses a Chicago-style notes system (confirm in the instructions for authors). Close with the declarations block: conflict of interest and funding.
Beyond that, match your article type’s specific limits rather than assuming the defaults apply, keep a Chicago-style notes system (confirm in the instructions for authors) formatting consistent from the first draft, and submit only through ScholarOne Manuscripts — email submissions aren’t processed.
The shell mirrors what Mind’s editorial staff check first: abstract format and length, a Chicago-style notes system (confirm in the instructions for authors) reference formatting, and a complete declarations block. For the journal’s full aims and scope, see the Mind journal home page. Mind offers an open-access option; check the current article-processing charge and any waiver before you commit. Manuscripts go in through ScholarOne Manuscripts, which also tracks your paper through peer review.
| Element | Mind requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | a short abstract stating the thesis and argument |
| Main text | an introduction, the argument, objections and replies, and a conclusion |
| Declarations | Conflict of interest and funding |
| Figures / tables | Captioned, cited in order; check format and resolution rules in the guide |
| Supplemental | Large datasets, extra tables, code — uploaded separately and cited in text |
| Submission | ScholarOne Manuscripts |
Read the Mind author guidelines once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after your results are stable so it matches the paper. Set a Chicago-style notes system (confirm in the instructions for authors) as your reference style before adding a single citation — retrofitting it later is where errors creep in.
Skim two or three recent Mind papers to calibrate depth, structure, and figure style. State your contribution in the first two paragraphs, not on page ten. Write a data-availability statement that names a real repository rather than a placeholder, and disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in your cover letter. Confirm current open-access pricing and any institutional agreement before committing to a fee.
Do one focused pass against the Mind author guidelines: scope fit, abstract format, length, a Chicago-style notes system (confirm in the instructions for authors) references, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through ScholarOne Manuscripts.