Draft for Lab on a Chip with confidence. The template sets the correct structure, abstract, and references up front, so your manuscript clears editorial screening.
4.6
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 25 July, 2026
Submitting to Lab on a Chip goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Lab on a Chip guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Lab on a Chip. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Lab on a Chip journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Lab on a Chip guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Lab on a Chip guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the RSC submission system.
| Element | LC requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Unstructured, single paragraph. Word limit: 50 to 250 words. Should be concise and easy to read with recognizable words and phrases, set out main objectives and results, emphasize potential impact, and avoid detailed information on methods. No article-type-specific differences stated. |
| Main text | Section order and length per article type |
| Declarations | Ethics, competing interests, funding, data as required |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Not requested. RSC journals do not use author-submitted keywords; the official author guidelines make no mention of keywords as a submission requirement, only referring to them in the context of making titles and abstracts searchable. |
| References | Vancouver style. The guidelines state: 'It's important you use Vancouver style (not Harvard style). However, we will format your content according to our house style before publication.' |
| Peer review | Single-anonymised (traditional, default option) or transparent peer review (optional). The journal offers both: 'This journal offers transparent peer review as well as traditional, single-anonymised peer review during the submission process.' In transparent review, reviewer comments remain anonymous unless the reviewer chooses to sign their report. |
| Submission | mc.manuscriptcentral.com |
Read the Lab on a Chip guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Lab on a Chip in under a page.
Skim two or three recent LC papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Lab on a Chip journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Lab on a Chip guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the RSC submission system.