Format your manuscript to the Judgment and Decision Making requirements — abstract, APA (7th edition) references, and required declarations — and submit through the journal's online submission system without a formatting rejection.
4.5
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 19 August, 2026
Getting past the desk at Judgment and Decision Making is usually less about the research and more about matching the journal’s exact submission rules. This template is built around JDM’s actual requirements — its abstract rules, APA (7th edition) references, and the required declarations — so your submission clears screening on the first pass. Everything below tracks the JDM author guidelines; check it directly if anything looks out of date by the time you submit.
It’s a manuscript shell set up to JDM’s specifications for the psychology of judgment and decision making. Judgment and Decision Making is published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making. The shell covers the title page, the abstract, a body in Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) order, and a reference list in APA (7th edition) style.
Start with the title page (authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs). The abstract is an unstructured abstract of ≤250 words. JDM also expects reproducible data and analysis code. The body follows Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD), and the reference list uses APA (7th edition). Close with the declarations block: conflict of interest, funding, and data and code availability.
Beyond that, match your article type’s specific limits rather than assuming the defaults apply, keep APA (7th edition) formatting consistent from the first draft, and submit only through the journal's online submission system — email submissions aren’t processed.
The shell mirrors what JDM’s editorial staff check first: abstract format and length, APA (7th edition) reference formatting, and a complete declarations block. For the journal’s full aims and scope, see the JDM journal home page. Judgment and Decision Making is open access; check the current policy and any charges. Manuscripts go in through the journal's online submission system, which also tracks your paper through peer review.
| Element | JDM requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | an unstructured abstract of ≤250 words |
| Main text | Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) |
| Declarations | Conflict of interest, funding, and data and code availability |
| Figures / tables | Captioned, cited in order; check format and resolution rules in the guide |
| Supplemental | Large datasets, extra tables, code — uploaded separately and cited in text |
| Submission | the journal's online submission system |
Read the JDM author guidelines once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after your results are stable so it matches the paper. Set APA (7th edition) as your reference style before adding a single citation — retrofitting it later is where errors creep in. Prepare reproducible data and analysis code early rather than leaving it to the end.
Skim two or three recent JDM papers to calibrate depth, structure, and figure style. State your contribution in the first two paragraphs, not on page ten. Write a data-availability statement that names a real repository rather than a placeholder, and disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in your cover letter. Confirm current open-access pricing and any institutional agreement before committing to a fee.
Do one focused pass against the JDM author guidelines: scope fit, abstract format, length, APA (7th edition) references, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's online submission system.