Get your Journal of Hazardous Materials Letters paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.3
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 17 August, 2026
Submitting to Journal of Hazardous Materials Letters goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Journal of Hazardous Materials Letters guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Journal of Hazardous Materials Letters. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Journal of Hazardous Materials Letters journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Journal of Hazardous Materials Letters guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Journal of Hazardous Materials Letters guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | J Hazardous Mater Lett requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Unstructured abstract required, maximum 250 words. The abstract should be concise and factual, briefly stating the purpose of research, principal results and major conclusions. Abstracts must be able to stand alone. References should be avoided in the abstract; if essential, cite author(s) and year(s). Non-standard or uncommon abbreviations should be avoided; if essential, define at first mention |
| Main text | Maximum 3000 words (excluding the list of references) for standard papers (Letters and Brief communications). Combined tables and figures must not exceed 4. Article types: (1) Letters - main article type requiring significant novelty and scientific impact; (2) Brief communications - succinct reports of complete research describing significant findings with broad applications, not for preliminary data; (3) Frontier reviews - focused review articles by experts on current advances, require special cover letter information |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | 1 to 7 keywords required for indexing purposes. Keywords should be written in English. Authors should try to avoid keywords consisting of multiple words (using 'and' or 'of'). Abbreviations in keywords should only be used if they are firmly established in the field |
| References | Author-date citation style (Harvard-like format). In-text citations: single author by name and year; two authors by both names and year; three or more authors by first author's name followed by 'et al.' and year. Reference list arranged alphabetically and then chronologically if necessary. Multiple references from same author(s) in same year identified by letters 'a', 'b', 'c' after year. Journal names abbreviated according to LTWA (List of Title Word Abbreviations). At submission, references can be in any style as long as consistent; journal's reference style applied at proof stage after acceptance |
| Peer review | Single anonymized review process (single-blind peer review). Submissions are initially assessed by editors. If deemed suitable, manuscripts are typically sent to a minimum of two reviewers for independent expert assessment of scientific quality. Editors make the final decision on acceptance or rejection |
| Submission | submit.elsevier.com/HAZL |
Read the Journal of Hazardous Materials Letters guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Journal of Hazardous Materials Letters in under a page.
Skim two or three recent J Hazardous Mater Lett papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Journal of Hazardous Materials Letters journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Journal of Hazardous Materials Letters guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.