Get your Journal of Choice Modelling paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.3
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 17 August, 2026
Submitting to Journal of Choice Modelling goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Journal of Choice Modelling guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Journal of Choice Modelling. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Journal of Choice Modelling journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Journal of Choice Modelling guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Journal of Choice Modelling guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | J Choice Modelling requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Unstructured abstract, maximum 250 words. The abstract should briefly state the purpose of research, principal results and major conclusions. Abstracts must be able to stand alone. References should be avoided, but if essential, must cite author(s) and year(s). Non-standard or uncommon abbreviations should be avoided, but if essential, must be defined at first mention. No distinction by article type is specified in the guide |
| Main text | No specific word or page limits stated for standard full length research papers. Research notes have no specific length limit imposed, but authors are advised to look at volume 21 as an example. Other article types (software papers, data papers, review papers, discussion papers) also do not specify length limits. Foundational primer papers are invitation-only |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | 1 to 7 keywords required for indexing purposes. Keywords should be written in English. Authors should avoid keywords consisting of multiple words (using 'and' or 'of'). Abbreviations in keywords are recommended only if firmly established in the field |
| References | Any consistent style or format accepted at submission. References can be in any style as long as consistent. Author names, journal/book titles, article/chapter titles, year, volume numbers, article numbers or pagination must be included where applicable. The journal's reference style will be applied after acceptance at proof stage |
| Peer review | Single-blind / single-anonymized review process. Submissions are initially assessed by editors; if suitable, typically sent to a minimum of two reviewers for independent expert assessment of scientific quality. Final decision made by editors |
| Submission | submit.elsevier.com/CHOICE |
Read the Journal of Choice Modelling guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Journal of Choice Modelling in under a page.
Skim two or three recent J Choice Modelling papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Journal of Choice Modelling journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Journal of Choice Modelling guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.