Writing for Journal of Cataract Refractive Surgery? This template gives you a submission-ready structure—sections, abstract, and references—so you focus on the research, not the formatting.
4.5
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 25 July, 2026
Submitting to Journal of Cataract Refractive Surgery goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Journal of Cataract Refractive Surgery guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Journal of Cataract Refractive Surgery. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Journal of Cataract Refractive Surgery journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Journal of Cataract Refractive Surgery guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Journal of Cataract Refractive Surgery guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through Editorial Manager.
| Element | CRS requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Structured abstract required for Full-length and Laboratory Science manuscripts, up to 250 words with 6 required section titles: Purpose (state principal question/hypothesis, begin with 'To'), Setting (state practice/clinical/hospital/outpatient center with full city/state/country), Design (describe as retrospective/prospective, study design, randomization and masking method), Methods (describe patients, selection procedures, inclusion/exclusion criteria, intervention procedures, outcome measurements), Results (state total number of patients/eyes included, present outcomes and measurements with statistical significance, include raw numbers with percentages), Conclusions (state conclusions and clinical pertinence). Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses have separate abstract guidelines. Review, Special Report, and Survey manuscripts require descriptive abstract up to 150 words. Correspondence manuscripts require descriptive abstract up to 150 words (used only for peer review, not published). |
| Main text | Section order and length per article type |
| Declarations | Ethics, competing interests, funding, data as required |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| References | Numbered citations in order of first mention in text using superscript format. All author names must be listed (do not use 'et al.' in reference list). Follow AMA Manual of Style, 11th edition format. Reference maximum: Full-length/Special Report/Survey (35), Laboratory Science (35), Review/Update (70), Correspondence (15), Ophthalmic Images (2), Letter/Reply (5). References over maximum may be submitted as Supplemental Data. |
| Peer review | Double-blind peer review (both reviewer and author identities concealed from each other throughout review process). Manuscripts triaged by Editors, sent for peer review with goal to obtain minimum of 2 independent expert reviews. Editors make final decision after 1 or more rounds of review. All aspects of peer review strictly confidential. Journal policy for both Editors and reviewers to recuse themselves from any manuscript where there may be actual or appearance of conflict of interest. If Editor or Editorial Board member authors/co-authors a manuscript, that person will not be involved in peer review or decision-making process. |
| Submission | editorialmanager.com |
Read the Journal of Cataract Refractive Surgery guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Journal of Cataract Refractive Surgery in under a page.
Skim two or three recent CRS papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Journal of Cataract Refractive Surgery journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Journal of Cataract Refractive Surgery guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through Editorial Manager.