Get your JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.9
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 17 August, 2026
Submitting to JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through Editorial Manager.
| Element | JCO Clin Cancer Informatics requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Structured abstract required for most article types with 275-word limit. Original Reports require structured abstract with headings: PURPOSE, PATIENTS AND METHODS (or MATERIALS AND METHODS, or DESIGN for reviews), RESULTS, CONCLUSION. Resource Reports require structured abstract with headings: Background and Scope, Solution, Evaluation, Relevance, How to Access/Use (must include active link to tool). Review Articles allow 275-word unstructured or structured abstract. Statistics in Oncology articles require 275-word abstract (structure not explicitly specified). Commentaries, Editorials, and Correspondence do not require abstracts |
| Main text | Main text word limits by article type: Original Reports: 3,000 words; Resource Reports: 3,000 words; Review Articles: 4,000 words; Statistics in Oncology: 4,000 words; Special Articles: 4,000 words; Commentaries: 2,000 words; Editorials: 1,500 words; Correspondence: 750 words. Under EZSubmit policy, initial submissions may exceed word limit by up to 1,000 words, but revised manuscripts must meet the article type's word limit. Figure and table limits: 6 for most article types, 1 for Commentaries and Editorials, 3 for Correspondence |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Not specified in the official author guidelines |
| References | ASCO/JCO reference style (numbered sequential style similar to Vancouver/AMA). References must be listed in order of appearance in text. At submission, any reference style is accepted under EZSubmit policy (format-free submission). Journal automatically adjusts reference formatting after acceptance to conform to ASCO style: Author(s): Title. Journal abbreviated name volume:pages, year. Example: Knox S, Hoppe RT, Maloney D, et al: Treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma with chimeric anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody. Blood 87:893-899, 1996 |
| Peer review | Single-anonymized (single-blind): Reviewers know the identity of the authors, but authors do not know the identity of the reviewers. Approximately 1/3 of submissions are rejected without external review. Manuscripts sent for external review are typically evaluated by at least two reviewers |
| Submission | www.editorialmanager.com/cci-ascopubs/default2.aspx |
Read the JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics in under a page.
Skim two or three recent JCO Clin Cancer Informatics papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through Editorial Manager.