Get your JBI Evidence Implementation paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.2
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 17 August, 2026
Submitting to JBI Evidence Implementation goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the JBI Evidence Implementation guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to JBI Evidence Implementation. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the JBI Evidence Implementation journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the JBI Evidence Implementation guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the JBI Evidence Implementation guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | JBI Evidence Implementation requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Structured abstract with four sections: Objective, Methods, Results, Conclusions. Approximately 200 words based on examination of published articles. Abstract structure may vary by article type (e.g., methodology papers, implementation projects, original research). Full specifications NOT_FOUND in official guidelines |
| Main text | - No word or page limits for main text were located in available sources |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | 3-5 keywords required based on published articles examined (e.g., recent articles show 3-5 keywords per article). Whether MeSH terms are required or if keywords are editor-assigned is NOT_FOUND in available sources |
| References | Numbered citation style (Vancouver/AMA style) based on examination of published articles. References are numbered consecutively in order of citation. Full detailed requirements NOT_FOUND in official guidelines |
| Peer review | Double-blind peer review (confirmed from multiple Facebook and Instagram announcements by the journal's official social media accounts @JBIEBHC) |
| Submission | edmgr.ovid.com/ijebh/ |
Read the JBI Evidence Implementation guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to JBI Evidence Implementation in under a page.
Skim two or three recent JBI Evidence Implementation papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the JBI Evidence Implementation journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the JBI Evidence Implementation guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.