Get your International Review of Administrative Sciences paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.7
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 17 August, 2026
Submitting to International Review of Administrative Sciences goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the International Review of Administrative Sciences guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to International Review of Administrative Sciences. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the International Review of Administrative Sciences journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the International Review of Administrative Sciences guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the International Review of Administrative Sciences guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through ScholarOne (Manuscript Central).
| Element | Int Rev Administrative Sci requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Unstructured abstract with no specific word limit stated in the guide. Must concisely state: purpose of research, major findings, and conclusions. Must also include Points to Practitioners in the abstract. For clinical trials: trial registry name, URL, and registration number must be included at end of abstract. Same requirements for both research and review articles |
| Main text | Research articles: 9000 words of text (excluding title page, abstract, notes, references, tables, figures, etc.). Review articles: 9000 words of text (excluding title page, abstract, notes, references, tables, figures, etc.). Research articles typically contain: title page, abstract, introduction with problem description and question, classification of research in general research context, explanation of research methods, presentation of results, discussion and conclusions, references, figures and tables |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Minimum 3-5 keywords required, listed after the abstract. Keywords should be as specific as possible to the research topic |
| References | Sage Harvard reference style. Every in-text citation must have a corresponding citation in the reference list and vice versa. Corresponding citations must have identical spelling and year |
| Peer review | Double-anonymized (double-blind). Identity transparency is double anonymized, meaning the reviewer's name is withheld from the author and the author's name is withheld from the reviewer. The reviewer may at their own discretion opt to reveal their name to the author in their review, but standard policy practice is for both identities to remain concealed |
| Submission | mc.manuscriptcentral.com/iras |
Read the International Review of Administrative Sciences guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to International Review of Administrative Sciences in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Int Rev Administrative Sci papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the International Review of Administrative Sciences journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the International Review of Administrative Sciences guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through ScholarOne (Manuscript Central).