Get your International Nursing Review paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.8
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 17 August, 2026
Submitting to International Nursing Review goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the International Nursing Review guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to International Nursing Review. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the International Nursing Review journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the International Nursing Review guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the International Nursing Review guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | Int Nursing Rev requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Structured abstract required. Word limit varies by article type: Original Research (Quantitative/Qualitative) requires 240-275 words with mandatory headings: Aim, Background/Introduction, Methods (including the name of the relevant EQUATOR checklist used to report the study), Results or Findings, Discussion, Conclusion, Implications for nursing, and Implications for Nursing Policy, and/or Health Policy and/or Social Policy. Systematic Literature Reviews require 250-300 words. Other non-empirical manuscripts require 240-275 words with headings: Aim, Background, Sources of Evidence, Discussion, Conclusion, Implications for Nursing Practice; Implications for Nursing Policy and/or Health Policy and/or Social Policy. Short communications require up to 140 words |
| Main text | Original Research (Quantitative/Qualitative): 4,000-5,500 words including abstract and references, with no more than 40 references. Systematic Literature Reviews: 5,000-7,000 words including abstract and references, with no more than 55 references. All non-empirical manuscripts: no longer than 4,000 words including abstract and references. Short communications: limited to 2,000 words including abstract and references. Letters to the Editor: less than 1,000 words. Section order for research manuscripts: Introduction, Background (including literature review), Aim of study, Methods (with sub-sections: Research Design, Sample and setting, Data collection, Ethical considerations, Data analysis), Results or Findings, Study limitations, Discussion, Conclusion and recommendations, Implications for nursing practice and policy |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | 6-10 keywords required, arranged in alphabetical order. Authors may use Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) or CINAHL subject headings from recognized databases. Keywords should avoid long phrases and may include countries linked to the article and the research approach of the study |
| References | INR-specific author-date style (similar to Harvard/APA). In-text references use author name(s) followed by year (Lee 2015), or first author et al. for more than two authors (Andrew et al. 2014). Reference list is alphabetical by first author family name. Journal articles with four or fewer authors list all names; five or more use first author et al. All citations require DOI or URL with accessed date. Majority of literature (>50%) should be from within the last 5 years |
| Peer review | Double-blind (double-anonymous) peer review. The names of the reviewers are not disclosed to the corresponding author, and the name(s) of the author(s) are not disclosed to the reviewers. At least two international experts review each manuscript |
| Submission | authors.wiley.com/journal/inr |
Read the International Nursing Review guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to International Nursing Review in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Int Nursing Rev papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the International Nursing Review journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the International Nursing Review guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.