Get your International Journal for Educational Integrity paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.9
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 17 August, 2026
Submitting to International Journal for Educational Integrity goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the International Journal for Educational Integrity guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to International Journal for Educational Integrity. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the International Journal for Educational Integrity journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the International Journal for Educational Integrity guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the International Journal for Educational Integrity guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | Int J Educ Integrity requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | For Original Articles and Review Articles: The abstract should briefly summarize the aim, findings or purpose of the article. Minimize the use of abbreviations and do not cite references in the abstract. No specific word limit is stated in the guidelines for these article types. For Comment articles: The abstract should not exceed 350 words and should be structured with a background, main body of the abstract and short conclusion. For Case Studies: Structured abstract with mandatory sections: Introduction (short description of issues being faced and rationale for the intervention), Case description of the case and parties involved and how the intervention was analysed), Discussion and Evaluation (discussion of the pros and cons, plus evaluation of feasibility and effectiveness of the intervention), and Conclusions (summary of lessons learnt and outline of proposed next steps). The guidelines reference word limits in the criteria section but do not specify the exact number in the main guidelines text |
| Main text | The guidelines do not specify overall word or page limits for the main text. The main text should contain the body of the article and may be broken into subsections with short, informative headings. Manuscripts should use double-line spacing, include line and page numbering, and use SI units |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Three to ten keywords representing the main content of the article |
| References | Basic Springer reference style (author-date format). Journal abbreviations follow Index Medicus/MEDLINE. Examples provided include format: Smith J, Jones M Jr, Houghton L (1999) Future of health insurance. N Engl J Med 965:325-329. Authors should use reference management software and follow the style with author names, year, title, journal, volume, and page numbers |
| Peer review | Double-anonymous peer review system (also called double-blind), where the reviewers do not know the names or affiliations of the authors and the reviewer reports provided to the authors are anonymous |
| Submission | submission.springernature.com/new-submission/40979/3 |
Read the International Journal for Educational Integrity guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to International Journal for Educational Integrity in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Int J Educ Integrity papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the International Journal for Educational Integrity journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the International Journal for Educational Integrity guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.