Format your manuscript to the Information Sciences requirements — abstract, references, and required declarations — and submit without a formatting rejection.
4.4
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 26 August, 2026
Submitting to Information Sciences goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Information Sciences guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Information Sciences. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Information Sciences journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Information Sciences guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Information Sciences guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | Information Sciences requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | The guide does not specify structured versus unstructured format or required headings. For Original research work, it says the Abstract should be up to 200 words. The general Abstract section says the concise, factual abstract must not exceed 250 words and should state the research purpose, principal results and major conclusions; it should stand alone, avoid references (or cite author(s) and year(s) if essential), and define any essential non-standard abbreviations at first mention |
| Main text | Original research work: experimental manuscripts should not be longer than 40 double-spaced typed pages and 8 figures + tables; theoretical manuscripts have a suggested maximum of 45 pages and 10 figures + tables. Contributions should include an Abstract (up to 200 words for Original research work) and a Conclusions section. Article structure requires clearly defined, numbered sections and numbered subsections (1.1, 1.1.1, etc.); the abstract is not included in section numbering. The guide separately says the acknowledgements section appears directly before the reference list. It does not prescribe a complete section order beyond these requirements; for theoretical work it describes Theory and Calculation sections |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Provide 1 to 7 keywords for indexing. Keywords must be in English. The guide asks authors to try to avoid keywords consisting of multiple words using ‘and’ or ‘of’, and recommends using abbreviations only when firmly established in the field |
| References | No strict reference-formatting requirements at submission. References may use any style or format as long as it is consistent, and should include author names, journal/book titles, chapter/article titles, publication year, volume numbers, article numbers or pagination where applicable. The journal's reference style is applied after acceptance at proof stage |
| Peer review | Single anonymized review process (single-anonymous): editors initially assess submissions; suitable submissions are typically reviewed by a minimum of two reviewers, and editors make the acceptance/rejection decision |
| Submission | submit.elsevier.com/INS |
Read the Information Sciences guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Information Sciences in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Information Sciences papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Information Sciences journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Information Sciences guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.