Get your Implementation Science Communications paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.2
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 17 August, 2026
Submitting to Implementation Science Communications goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Implementation Science Communications guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Implementation Science Communications. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Implementation Science Communications journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Implementation Science Communications guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Implementation Science Communications guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | Implementation Sci Communications requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Structured abstract, maximum 350 words. Structure varies by article type: - Research articles: Background (context and purpose), Methods (how study was performed and statistical tests used), Results (main findings), Conclusions (brief summary and potential implications), Trial registration (if applicable, with registration number and date) - Systematic reviews: Background (context, purpose, and review question), Methods (how review was performed, data sources, eligibility criteria, participants/interventions, appraisal and statistical tests), Results (main findings including search results and evidence assessment), Conclusions (brief summary and implications for policy/management and research), Registration information and number if available) - Methodology articles: Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions, Trial registration (if applicable) - Short reports: Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions, Trial registration (if applicable) - Study protocols: Background (context and purpose), Methods (how study will be performed), Discussion (brief summary and potential implications), Trial registration (with 'retrospectively registered' note if not registered prospectively) - Commentary and Debate articles: Background, main body of abstract, and short conclusion Minimize abbreviations; do not cite references in abstract. RCTs should follow CONSORT extension for abstracts |
| Main text | Word limits by article type (from Introduction to end of Conclusions, excluding abstract, tables, figures): - Research articles: 5,500 words maximum - Systematic reviews: 5,500 words maximum - Methodology articles: 5,500 words maximum - Study protocols: 5,500 words maximum (undergo editorial peer review by handling editor only) - Debate articles: 5,000 words maximum - Commentary: ~2,500 words - Short reports: 2,500 words maximum For many article types, length and quantity of data is not restricted; datasets, tables, movies, or other information can be provided as additional files |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Three to ten keywords representing the main content of the article |
| References | Vancouver style. Journal abbreviations follow Index Medicus/MEDLINE. Web links and URLs should be given a reference number and included in the reference list (not within text), provided in full with title of site, URL, and access date in format: The Mouse Tumor Biology Database. https://tumor.informatics.jax.org/mtbwi/index.do. Accessed 20 May 2013. Only published articles, in-press articles, or publicly available e-prints/preprints may be cited |
| Peer review | Transparent peer review (also called open peer review). Reviewer reports are published online alongside the article under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 if the article is published, but the reviewer is not named (single-anonymous/single-blind to readers, but reports are public) |
| Submission | submission.springernature.com/new-submission/43058/3 |
Read the Implementation Science Communications guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Implementation Science Communications in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Implementation Sci Communications papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Implementation Science Communications journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Implementation Science Communications guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.