Writing for Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal? This template gives you a submission-ready structure—sections, abstract, and references—so you focus on the research, not the formatting.
4.4
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 25 July, 2026
Submitting to Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the Taylor & Francis submission portal.
| Element | IAPA requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Unstructured abstract of 200 words. No specific headings required. Applies to all article types. |
| Main text | Section order and length per article type |
| Declarations | Ethics, competing interests, funding, data as required |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Between 3 and 6 keywords required |
| References | CSE (Council of Science Editors) style. The guide references tf_CSE.pdf as the reference style document. An EndNote output style (tf-standard-cse) is also available. |
| Peer review | Double-blind peer review (double-anonymous). The journal states: 'Once your paper has been assessed for suitability by the editor, it will then be double blind peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert.' |
| Submission | authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com |
Read the Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal in under a page.
Skim two or three recent IAPA papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the Taylor & Francis submission portal.