Get your ILR Review paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.1
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 13 August, 2026
Submitting to ILR Review goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the ILR Review guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to ILR Review. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the ILR Review journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the ILR Review guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the ILR Review guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through ScholarOne (Manuscript Central).
| Element | ILR Rev requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | 150 words maximum. The first sentence should describe the data, method, and purpose. Subsequent sentences should state the most important findings, conclusions, and sometimes implications, using terms that will be understood by a general audience. Use third-person singular or plural depending on the number of authors |
| Main text | Maximum 10,000 words including all text, tables, figures, footnotes, references, and appendices (excluding online supplements). Conclusion typically no more than two pages |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | 5–10 keywords and 1–10 JEL codes required |
| References | Author-date (scientific) in-text parenthetical citation style. References must include full first names of authors and both volume and issue numbers for articles. Alphabetized by last name of sole/first author |
| Peer review | Double-blind (manuscript must be purged of all information identifying authors and institutions; separate title page uploaded) |
| Submission | mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ilrr |
Read the ILR Review guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to ILR Review in under a page.
Skim two or three recent ILR Rev papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the ILR Review journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the ILR Review guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through ScholarOne (Manuscript Central).