Get your Human Resource Development Review paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.1
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 13 August, 2026
Submitting to Human Resource Development Review goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Human Resource Development Review guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Human Resource Development Review. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Human Resource Development Review journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Human Resource Development Review guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Human Resource Development Review guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through ScholarOne (Manuscript Central).
| Element | Hum Resour Development Rev requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Unstructured abstract of 100-200 words that concisely states the purpose of the research, major findings, and conclusions. For clinical trials, the trial registry name, URL, and registration number must be included at the end of the abstract. No variation by article type specified |
| Main text | Initial submission should not exceed 40 pages in length, including abstract, keywords, references, tables, and figures. No specific word count limit or section order requirements for main text are stated beyond this overall page limit |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Minimum of 4-5 keywords, listed after the abstract. Keywords should be as specific as possible to the research topic. Author-selected |
| References | APA (American Psychological Association) reference style. Every in-text citation must have a corresponding citation in the reference list and vice versa. Corresponding citations must have identical spelling and year |
| Peer review | Double-anonymized (double-blind): the identity of both the reviewer and author are concealed from both parties. Two independent reviews are required for a manuscript to reach a Revise or Accept decision |
| Submission | mc.manuscriptcentral.com/hrdr |
Read the Human Resource Development Review guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Human Resource Development Review in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Hum Resour Development Rev papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Human Resource Development Review journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Human Resource Development Review guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through ScholarOne (Manuscript Central).