Get your Human Reproduction Update paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.7
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 13 August, 2026
Submitting to Human Reproduction Update goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Human Reproduction Update guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Human Reproduction Update. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Human Reproduction Update journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Human Reproduction Update guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Human Reproduction Update guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through ScholarOne (Manuscript Central).
| Element | Hum Reproduction Update requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Structured abstract with mandatory headings: Background, Objective and rationale, Search methods, Outcomes, Wider implications, Registration number. Word limit: 400-500 words (stated as 'less than 500 words' and '400-500 words') |
| Main text | 6000-10000 words of text, 2-5 tables, 3-5 figures, and 200-300 references |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | A minimum of five, and maximum of ten, key words required |
| References | Author-date citation style (Harvard style variant). In-text citations: cite by author and date (two authors: list both; more than two authors: first author et al.). Multiple references listed chronologically. Reference list: alphabetical order. Format: Authors. Title. Journal year; volume: pg-pg. Up to 10 authors included, then et al |
| Peer review | Peer reviewed; blind model not specified in the official author guidelines |
| Submission | mc.manuscriptcentral.com/hru |
Read the Human Reproduction Update guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Human Reproduction Update in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Hum Reproduction Update papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Human Reproduction Update journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Human Reproduction Update guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through ScholarOne (Manuscript Central).