Get your Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.6
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 13 August, 2026
Submitting to Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's editorial office.
| Element | Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Rev requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | The journal does NOT use traditional abstracts. Instead, Research Articles require: (1) Article's lead [50 to 100 words] which 'is NOT an abstract and should NOT provide a comprehensive overview of the paper' but presents one or two highlights; (2) Research questions [100 words] in bullet points (max 4); (3) Essay summary [200 words] summarizing research methods, most important findings, and real-world implications in 1-2 sentences each. Research Notes use the same structure with 'Research note summary' instead of 'Essay summary'. Commentaries require Article's lead [50-100 words] and Introduction [150-300 words] presenting key arguments and significance |
| Main text | Research Articles: 1,500 to 3,000 words (excluding footnotes, appendices, and bibliography), though longer articles may be considered with advance approval via email explaining why the standard word count must be exceeded. Structured as: Implications [1,000 words], Findings/Evidence [1,000 words], Methods [500-1,000 words for quant/mixed; 500-1,000 words for qualitative]. Research Notes: 1,500 to 2,500 words maximum. Structured as: Implications [800 words], Findings/Evidence [800 words], Methods [400-800 words]. Commentaries: Maximum 2,000 words, structured as Introduction [150-300 words], Subsections [1,400 words], Conclusions [200-300 words] |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Not requested. Keywords are not mentioned anywhere in the official author guidelines |
| References | APA 7 (Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 7th Edition). All citations must follow the APA 7 author-date system with references formatted in alphabetical order. The journal provides detailed examples for formatting books, periodicals, websites, social media, datasets, software, federal testimonies, and other source types |
| Peer review | Double-blind (the journal explicitly states 'We use a double-blind review, in which the authors' and reviewers' identities and affiliations are concealed from each other'). Research Articles and Research Notes undergo double-blind peer review. Commentaries are usually not peer-reviewed but may be peer-reviewed at the discretion of editors, particularly if they present technical information |
| Submission | Email: misinforeview@hks.harvard.edu |
Read the Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Rev papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's editorial office.