Get your Global Heart paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 13 August, 2026
Submitting to Global Heart goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Global Heart guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Global Heart. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Global Heart journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Global Heart guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Global Heart guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through Editorial Manager.
| Element | Global Heart requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Structured for Original Research articles with headings Background, Objective(s), Methods, and Conclusions, maximum 300 words. Reviews (narrative): unstructured abstract of 150 words. Research Letters: no abstract. Viewpoints and Invited Editorials: not specified in the guide. Lessons from the Field: details in separate author instructions document |
| Main text | Original Research: no more than 5,000 words. Systematic Reviews: up to 7,500 words. Reviews (narrative): not exceed 7,500 words. Research Letters: up to 1,000 words. Lessons from the Field: no more than 1,000 words. Viewpoints: word limit of 1,500 words. Invited Editorials: word limit of 1,500 words. All word limits include referencing and citation. Section order for main text: clear introduction, methods, results, discussion and conclusion sections |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Up to six keywords may be placed below the abstract (optional) |
| References | Vancouver system - numbered citations in parentheses in numerical sequence, not superscript. Reference list at end in numerical order. URL or DOI should be included for all reference entries where possible |
| Peer review | Single-blind (reviewers remain anonymous for the review process, authors are known to reviewers) |
| Submission | www.editorialmanager.com/gheart/default2.aspx |
Read the Global Heart guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Global Heart in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Global Heart papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Global Heart journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Global Heart guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through Editorial Manager.