Fungal Biology Reviews Template
Get your Fungal Biology Reviews paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.5
How to Use the Fungal Biology Reviews Template | A Step-by-Step Guide
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 13 August, 2026
Submitting to Fungal Biology Reviews goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Fungal Biology Reviews guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
What is the Fungal Biology Reviews Template?
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Fungal Biology Reviews. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Fungal Biology Reviews journal page before you draft.
What's actually in a Fungal Biol Rev submission:
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Fungal Biology Reviews guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
What separates a clean submission from one that gets kicked back:
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Fungal Biology Reviews guide for authors before you submit.
What does this Fungal Biology Reviews Template include?
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through Editorial Manager.
Steps to Use This Template with SciSpace Agent
- Click Start Writing on this page. The SciSpace Agent prompt screen opens with the template loaded.
- Use the loaded template, or upload a version your group already uses for Fungal Biol Rev.
- Edit the prompt with your topic and article type, and note any requirement from the Fungal Biology Reviews guide for authors.
- Run the prompt. The agent drafts into the correct structure and reference style.
- Use View Outputs to verify required statements and formatting are present.
- Export and submit through Editorial Manager.
Fungal Biology Reviews Template Structure at a Glance
| Element | Fungal Biol Rev requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Unstructured abstract, maximum 250 words. Must be concise and factual, briefly stating the purpose of research, principal results and major conclusions. Abstracts must stand alone. Avoid references unless essential (cite author and year if included). Avoid non-standard abbreviations (define at first mention if essential). No variation by article type specified |
| Main text | Word limits by article type: General review articles (3000-7000 words) to overview important areas of fungal biology; Update/research focus articles (1500-2000 words) to highlight new and emerging areas; Opinion articles (1500-2000 words) to give personal viewpoints on controversial issues or suggest novel directions; Technical focus articles (1500-5000 words) to highlight existing and emerging techniques. Does NOT publish research papers with experimental data, Materials & Methods or Results sections |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | 1 to 10 keywords required for indexing purposes. Should be written in English. Avoid keywords consisting of multiple words (using 'and' or 'of'). Use abbreviations in keywords only if firmly established in the field |
| References | Author-date style (Harvard-like). In-text citations: single author = name + year; two authors = both names + year; three or more = first author et al. + year. Citations can be direct or parenthetical, listed alphabetically then chronologically. Reference list arranged alphabetically then chronologically. Multiple works by same author in same year identified with a, b, c after year. Journal names abbreviated according to LTWA (List of Title Word Abbreviations) |
| Peer review | Single anonymized review process (single-blind). Submission initially assessed by editors for suitability, then typically sent to minimum of two reviewers for independent expert assessment of scientific quality. Editors make final accept/reject decision |
| Submission | www.editorialmanager.com/fbr/default.aspx |
Quick Tips for Using the Fungal Biology Reviews Template
Read the Fungal Biology Reviews guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Fungal Biology Reviews in under a page.
Best Practices
Skim two or three recent Fungal Biol Rev papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Fungal Biology Reviews journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Before You Submit: Final Check
Do one focused pass against the Fungal Biology Reviews guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through Editorial Manager.
