Get your Frontiers in Toxicology paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 11 August, 2026
Submitting to Frontiers in Toxicology goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Frontiers in Toxicology guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Frontiers in Toxicology. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Frontiers in Toxicology journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Frontiers in Toxicology guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Frontiers in Toxicology guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | Frontiers Toxicol requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Single paragraph, structured (e.g., IMRAD format). Abstract word limits by article type: - Original Research, Systematic Review, Methods, Review, Policy and Practice Reviews, Hypothesis and Theory, Technology and Code, Study Protocol: Abstract required, no specific word limit stated in guidelines (general Frontiers standard is 350 words max for these types) - Mini Review, Perspective, Brief Research Report: Abstract required, no specific word limit stated (general Frontiers standard is 250 words for these types) - Case Report, Community Case Study, Conceptual Analysis: Abstract required, no specific word limit stated - Data Report: Abstract requirement not specified - Policy Brief: Up to 125 words in bullet point format - General Commentary, Opinion, Editorial: Abstract requirement not specified Minimize abbreviations, do not cite references, figures or tables. For clinical trials, include unique identifier and registration URL |
| Main text | Main text word count limits by article type (includes main body, footnotes, citations; excludes abstract, section titles, figure/table captions, funding, acknowledgments, references): - Original Research, Systematic Review, Methods, Review, Policy and Practice Reviews, Hypothesis and Theory, Technology and Code, Study Protocol: Maximum 12,000 words - Conceptual Analysis: Maximum 8,000 words - Community Case Study: Maximum 5,000 words - Brief Research Report: Maximum 4,000 words - Mini Review, Perspective, Case Report, Data Report, Policy Brief: Maximum 3,000 words - Opinion: Maximum 2,000 words - General Commentary: Maximum 1,000 words - Editorial: 1,000 to 5,000 words (depending on number of articles in Research Topic) |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Minimum of 5 and maximum of 8 keywords required for all article types. Pick keywords using a mix of generic and more specific terms on the article subject(s) |
| References | Harvard (author-date) reference style. References include full last name and first name initials of first six authors followed by et al. and year of publication in brackets. Alphabetical order for reference list. For examples, refer to Chicago Manual of Style |
| Peer review | Single-anonymous peer review (reviewers are anonymous to authors; visible to reviewers). Process includes independent review stage followed by interactive review stage (online forum) where authors and reviewers engage in direct, real-time conversation to reach consensus. Decision to accept must be unanimous among all reviewers and handling Associate Editor. Reviewer and Editor names/affiliations are published on the final article (transparent upon publication) |
| Submission | www.frontiersin.org/submission/submit?domainid=1&fieldid=80&specialtyid=0&entitytype=2&entityid=473 |
Read the Frontiers in Toxicology guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Frontiers in Toxicology in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Frontiers Toxicol papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Frontiers in Toxicology journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Frontiers in Toxicology guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.