Get your Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 11 August, 2026
Submitting to Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | Frontiers Synaptic Neurosci requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Structured abstract required, no longer than a single paragraph, following IMRAD format (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion). Specific requirements by article type: - Original Research, Systematic Review, Methods, Review, Mini Review, Hypothesis and Theory, Brief Research Report, Perspective: Abstract required (1 paragraph) - Data Report, General Commentary, Opinion, Editorial: Abstract not required - Clinical trial articles must include the unique identifier and URL of the trial registration Minimize abbreviations and do not cite references, figures or tables in the abstract. No specific word limit stated for the abstract itself |
| Main text | Maximum word counts by article type (main body text only, includes footnotes and citations; excludes abstract, section titles, figure/table captions, funding, acknowledgments, and bibliography): - Original Research: 12,000 words - Systematic Review: 12,000 words - Methods: 12,000 words - Review: 12,000 words - Hypothesis and Theory: 12,000 words - FAIR² Data: 12,000 words (capped) - Brief Research Report: 4,000 words (max 4 Figures/Tables) - Mini Review: 3,000 words (max 2 Figures/Tables) - Perspective: 3,000 words (max 2 Figures/Tables) - Data Report: 3,000 words (max 2 Figures/Tables) - Opinion: 2,000 words (max 1 Figure/Table) - General Commentary: 1,000 words (max 1 Figure/Table) - Editorial: 1,000 words for Topics with 5-10 articles, up to maximum 5,000 words for 50+ articles (1 Figure) - Correction: No word count specified |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Minimum of five and maximum of eight keywords required. Authors should use a mix of generic and more specific terms on the article subject(s) |
| References | Harvard (author-date) reference style. In-text citations use author-date format (e.g., Abbott and Nelson, 2000), and the reference list is alphabetically ordered by author surname |
| Peer review | Single-anonymized (single-blind) peer review. Reviewers can see the authors' names, but authors do not see reviewers' names during the review process. The journal uses an interactive review process where authors and reviewers engage in direct online dialogue. Upon publication, the reviewers' and editors' names are disclosed on the published article |
| Submission | www.frontiersin.org/submission/submit?domainid=1&fieldid=55&specialtyid=1082&entitytype=1&entityid=22 |
Read the Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Frontiers Synaptic Neurosci papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.