Get your in Neuroscience paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.6
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 25 July, 2026
Submitting to in Neuroscience goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the in Neuroscience guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to in Neuroscience. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the in Neuroscience journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the in Neuroscience guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the in Neuroscience guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the Frontiers submission system.
| Element | in Neuroscience requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Single paragraph, structured (e.g., IMRAD format). No specific word limit stated, only that it should be no longer than a single paragraph. Authors should follow requirements of the specific article type. For clinical trial articles, must include the unique identifier and URL of the publicly accessible trial registry. Minimize abbreviations, do not cite references, figures or tables. Use maximum amount of keywords in the first two sentences. |
| Main text | Section order and length per article type |
| Declarations | Ethics, competing interests, funding, data as required |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Minimum of 5, maximum of 8 keywords required for all article types. Use a mix of generic and more specific terms on the article subject(s). |
| References | Frontiers Harvard (Author/Date) style. Names of first six authors followed by et al. and DOI (when available). Given names abbreviated to initials. |
| Peer review | Single-blind (single anonymized). Frontiers operates a single anonymized model where reviewers assess manuscripts independently from authors, and reviewer identities remain undisclosed during the review process. When a manuscript is accepted for publication, the names of reviewers who endorsed publication appear on the published article. |
| Submission | frontiersin.org |
Read the in Neuroscience guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to in Neuroscience in under a page.
Skim two or three recent in Neuroscience papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the in Neuroscience journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the in Neuroscience guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the Frontiers submission system.